Back

Plant pathogenic Ralstonia share two core methyl-accepting chemoreceptors that drive chemotaxis toward distinct amino acid profiles

Avalos, J. K.; Elmgreen, V.; Guerrero, C. R.; Grulla, K. J.; Miqueo, K.; Parales, R. E.; Lowe-Power, T. M.; Schomer, R. A.

2025-04-08 microbiology
10.1101/2025.04.07.647700 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Ralstonia solanacearum species complex pathogens cause bacterial wilt disease in diverse plant families. These pathogens use chemotaxis and motility to discover host roots. The specificity of this process is conferred by methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs). We explored pangenomic variation of MCPs and other chemotaxis machinery across Ralstonia wilt pathogens. We classified 19 MCPs as broadly conserved, core MCPs, and we identified several accessory MCPs. Within their periplasmic sensing domains, two of the core MCPs contain a motif that is known to bind amino acid ligands: McpA1 and McpA2. To identify the ligands of McpA1 and McpA2, we constructed HyChemosensor strains. In HyChemosensor strains, the periplasmic sensing domains of the MCPs were translationally fused to the signaling domain of a model two component sensor, NarQ. The HyChemosensor assays revealed that the receptors, McpA1 and McpA2, have overlapping binding profiles for acidic amino acids. Nevertheless, McpA2 recognized a broader profile of amino acids. Quantitative swim plate assays confirmed that these receptors facilitate Ralstonias chemoattraction to amino acids. Consistent with prior evidence in a different Ralstonia strain background, mcpA1 was dispensable for virulence on tomato. However, single or double mutants lacking mcpA2 demonstrated reduced virulence on tomato following naturalistic soil soak inoculations. Thus, McpA1 and McpA2 have distinct roles in plant colonization, despite redundancy in their chemical specificity.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.