Connectomic traces of Hebbian plasticity in the entorhinal-hippocampal system
Grasso, E.; Corteze, M.; Schmidt, H.
Show abstract
The key model of how we learn and memorize is Hebbian learning in the hippocampus, via long-term potentiation of synapses, allowing the storage of associations, linkage to places, and their consolidation into imprinted episodes. Learning is therefore expected to change synaptic weights. With the notion of hippocampal circuits being the primary site of learning in the mammalian brain, it has been assumed that all synapses in these circuits are constantly exposed to synaptic plasticity, and possibly in a learned state. However, a testing of these hypotheses is so far missing. In particular, the systematic mapping of synaptic weight distributions, and their relation to Hebbian preconditions has not been achieved yet in the hippocampal-entorhinal system. Here, we report such a systematic connectomic mapping of synaptic weight distributions and their relation to same-axon same-dendrite paired synaptic configurations across the hippocampal-entorhinal system. By analyzing millions of synapses and tens of thousands of paired synaptic configurations from 3D EM-based automated circuit reconstructions in hippocampal areas CA3, CA1, and layers 2 and 3 of the medial entorhinal cortex (MEC), we found systematic and unique synaptic weight distributions, with almost 50% (but not 100%) of synaptic weights in CA1 being in a Hebbian-consistent state, CA3 uniquely exhibiting small synaptic weights with indications of learned states, and MEC resembling previous data from other isocortices, with only up to 20% learned synaptic configurations. We further analyzed the sublayer-specificity of these weight distributions, finding the molecular layer of CA1 and the lower layers of CA3 being the most unique site of potential learning. Together, this data provides a first systematic synaptic weight analysis of the key neuronal system involved in memory formation in mammalian brains.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Oscillation-driven memory encoding, maintenance and recall in an entorhinal-hippocampal circuit model 95%
- 3D Synaptic Organization of Layer III of the Human Anterior Cingulate and Temporopolar Cortex 95%
- Synapses from the high-order thalamic nucleus and motor cortex are co-clustered spatially in the distal tuft dendrites of the somatosensory cortex 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hippocampal sharp wave-ripples and the associated sequence replay emerge from structured synaptic interactions in a network model of area CA3 95%
- Assemblies, synapse clustering and network topology interact with plasticity to explain structure-function relationships of the cortical connectome 95%
- The rapid developmental rise of somatic inhibition disengages hippocampal dynamics from self-motion 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hippocampal spike-time correlations and place-field overlaps during open field foraging 95%
- Consistent population activity on the scale of minutes in the mouse hippocampus 95%
- Dominant role of adult neurogenesis-induced structural heterogeneities in driving plasticity heterogeneity in dentate gyrus granule cells 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Heterogeneity of network and coding states in CA1 95%
- Thalamic control of sensory enhancement and sleep spindle properties in a biophysical model of thalamoreticular microcircuitry 95%
- Multiscale model of primary motor cortex circuits predicts in vivo cell type-specific, behavioral state-dependent dynamics 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The neural and computational architecture of feedback dynamics in mouse cortex during stimulus report 95%
- Interaction between theta-phase and spike-timing dependent plasticity simulates theta induced memory effects 94%
- Traces of semantization - from episodic to semantic memory in a spiking cortical network model 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.