Back

Transcription factor hubs exhibit gene-specific properties that tune expression

Fallacaro, S.; Mukherjee, A.; Turner, M. A.; Garcia, H. G.; Mir, M.

2025-04-08 biophysics
10.1101/2025.04.07.647578 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Transcription factors (TFs) form dynamic, high-concentration clusters, or "hubs", proposed to increase TF binding frequency at target enhancers. However, how enhancer sequence shapes hub properties remains unclear. We developed a live-imaging based framework to quantify the spatiotemporal relationship between TF hubs and actively transcribed genes in live Drosophila embryos. Examining hubs formed by the TF Dorsal across enhancers with defined binding-site composition, we find that hub enrichment and persistence scale with the number of Dorsal binding motifs. However, these hub properties do not predict transcriptional burst behavior for a given enhancer. Combining quantitative imaging with computational modeling, we show that Dorsal hubs arise from TF-DNA binding kinetics rather than actively increasing target occupancy. These findings support a model in which TF hubs are emergent features of enhancer-encoded TF-DNA interactions encoded by enhancer sequence rather than higher-order regulatory assemblies.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 4%
18.0%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.1%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Molecular Cell
○ 350 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
11.5%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Cell Reports
○ 1498 papers in training set
Top 4%
7.6%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 7%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Science
● 477 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.5%
Similar papers in this journal
7
Nucleic Acids Research
◐ 1281 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.3%
8
Science Advances
● 1243 papers in training set
Top 6%
4.7%
9
Molecular Systems Biology
○ 162 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.1%
10
Developmental Cell
○ 196 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
11
Nature
○ 645 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
12
Nature Cell Biology
○ 118 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
The EMBO Journal
○ 309 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.7%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.7%
16
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
236 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
Cell Systems
○ 201 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
18
Cell
○ 431 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
19
Biophysical Journal
○ 631 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Development
● 497 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.