Back

Context-dependent Interactors Regulate TDP-43 Dysfunction in ALS/FTLD

Xie, L.; Zhu, Y.; Hurtle, B. T.; Wright, M.; Robinson, J. L.; Mauna, J. C.; Brown, E. E.; Ngo, M.; Bergmann, C. A.; Xu, J.; Merjane, J.; Gleixner, A. M.; Grigorean, G.; Liu, F.; Rossoll, W.; Lee, E. B.; Kiskinis, E.; Chikina, M.; Donnelly, C. J.

2025-04-09 molecular biology
10.1101/2025.04.07.646890 bioRxiv
Show abstract

TDP-43 mislocalization, aggregation, and loss of splicing function are neuropathological hallmarks in over 97% of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), 45% of Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (FTLD), and 60% of Alzheimers Disease, which has been reclassified as LATE-NC. However, the mechanisms underlying TDP-43 dysfunction remain elusive. Here, we utilize APEX2-driven proximity labeling and mass spectrometry to characterize the context-dependent TDP-43 interactome in conditions of cytoplasmic mislocalization, impaired RNA-binding contributing to aggregation, and oxidative stress. We describe context-dependent interactors, including disrupted interactions with splicing-related proteins and altered biomolecular condensate (BMC) associations. By integrating ALS and FTLD snRNA-seq data, we uncover disease-relevant molecular alterations and validate our dataset through a functional screen that identifies key TDP- 43 regulators. We demonstrate that disrupting nuclear speckle integrity, particularly through the downregulation of the splicing factor SRRM2, promotes TDP-43 mislocalization and loss of function. Additionally, we identify NUFIP2 as an interactor associated with mislocalization that sequesters TDP-43 into cytoplasmic aggregates and co-localizes with TDP-43 pathology in patient tissue. We also highlight HNRNPC as a potent TDP-43 splicing regulator, where precise modulation of TDP-43 or HNRNPC can rescue cryptic exon splicing. These findings provide mechanistic insights and potential therapeutic targets for TDP-43 dysfunction.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.