Back

Relating hippocampal subfield microstructure to delayed verbal memory in cognitively intact individuals at genetic risk for developing Alzheimer's disease.

Hakhu, S.; VanGilder, J. L.; Hooyman, A.; Schilling, K.; Hu, L.; Zhou, Y.; Caselli, R.; Baxter, L.; Beeman, S. C.

2025-04-08 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2025.04.07.25325398 medRxiv
Show abstract

Early intervention to delay the onset of Alzheimers disease (AD) is an important treatment strategy but detecting at-risk individuals before significant disease progression remains challenging. This study evaluates the relationship between hippocampal microstructure and verbal cognition in cognitively intact older adults, focusing on the differences between APOE {varepsilon}4 allele carriers and noncarriers. Participants (n=41 noncarriers, 33 carriers) over 60 years old (mean{+/-}SD: carriers 71{+/-}6.6; noncarriers 71{+/-}6.4 years) underwent diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) and volumetric assessments. We assessed hippocampal structure, including microstructure, using Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging (NODDI), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and volumetric measures. Regression analyses examined the relationship between these hippocampal measures and verbal and visuospatial cognition, as evaluated by the Rey delayed recall tests i.e., the Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT) and Complex Figure Test (CFT), respectively. Results indicated that while volumetric data showed no significant findings, microstructural measures, particularly orientation dispersion (ODI) in the left subiculum, were positively associated with verbal recall in APOE {varepsilon}4 carriers (FDR-corrected p=0.01). These findings suggest that hippocampal microstructure, rather than volume, may provide early insights into cognitive decline in individuals at genetic risk for AD.

Published in Experimental Gerontology (predicted rank #14) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.