Back

How the rhizosphere chemistry explains the effectiveness of radish in reclaiming legacy phosphorus compared to maize

Yusuf, Y. M.; Montanha, G. S.; Benghzial, K.; Pavinato, P. S.; Pereira de Carvalho, H. W.

2025-04-06 plant biology
10.1101/2025.04.06.647426 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Background and aimsAround 50% of phosphorus (P) applied to tropical soils is not used by plants and become part of the legacy P. Some cover crops can extract this P. But how do they do this and which form do they extract most? MethodsRadish (Raphanus sativus L.) and maize (Zea mays L.) were planted in rhizoboxes and tubes containing a mixture of sand, kaolinite, hematite, and boehmite, the later and former bearing sorbed phosphate. The structure and composition of the root-soil interface were determined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Fourier- transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Additionally, synchrotron-based microprobe X-ray fluorescence ({micro}XRF) was employed to assess the spatial distribution of Al, Fe, and P. The P speciation at the rhizosphere was evaluated using microprobe X-ray absorption near edge structure ({micro}XANES). ResultsThe chemical images revealed that both plants depleted more of the Al-bound P than Fe-bound P, with radish demonstrated a higher efficiency compared to maize. The total P uptake by radish from Al-bound P was 42% higher than that uptake from Fe-bound P. Additionally, radish absorbed 34% to 90% more total P compared to maize, indicating a significant difference between the two crops. The superior capacity exhibited by radish seems to be connected to organic acids and total carbon exudation, which the latter was 2.14-fold more than maize. ConclusionRadish uptakes greater Al-bound P than Fe-bound P. This insight could help in proper management of soils where P is predominantly bound to Al and significantly increases P use efficiency.

Published in Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.