Effectiveness of Gastric Cancer Endoscopic Screening in Intermediate-Risk Countries, a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Mourato, M. B.; Pratas, N.; Branco Pereira, A.; Chanca, R.; Fronteira, I.; Dinis, R.; Areia, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundGastric cancer remains a major cause of cancer mortality worldwide, including in intermediate-risk countries. While endoscopic screening has proven effective in high-risk populations, its impact and economic value in intermediate-risk settings remain uncertain. ObjectiveThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of endoscopic screening for gastric cancer in these countries. DesignA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following a comprehensive search in Medline, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science, covering studies published up to 30 September 2024. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed for effectiveness studies, and economic evaluations were synthesised narratively. The study registration number at PROSPERO is CRD42024502174. ResultsThirty-two studies met inclusion criteria--24 on screening effectiveness and eight on cost-effectiveness. Across the 24 effectiveness studies, 404,159 individuals underwent upper endoscopic screening, which significantly increased detection of precancerous lesions (pooled effect size: 28%, p < 0.001) and early-stage gastric cancer among neoplasms (73.6%, p < 0.001). Screening was also associated with a 26.1% reduction in gastric cancer mortality and improved five-year survival (63.7% to 85.0%). Economic analyses suggested endoscopic screening is cost-effective in intermediate-risk settings, particularly when combined with colorectal cancer screening. ConclusionsEndoscopic screening improves early detection and survival in intermediate-risk countries. Cost-effectiveness studies support its feasibility, especially when integrated with colorectal cancer screening or risk-stratified strategies. KEY MESSAGESO_ST_ABSWhat is already known on this topicC_ST_ABSEndoscopic screening reduces gastric cancer mortality in high-risk countries. Evidence in intermediate-risk settings remains limited. What this study addsThis review shows that endoscopic screening improves early detection and gastric cancer prognosis in intermediate-risk countries and is cost-effective in several models. How this study might affect research, practice or policyFindings support implementing screening where cost-effectiveness is demonstrated, aligning with ESGE MAPS III recommendations.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-endoscopic screening for Barrett’s esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in at risk Veterans 93%
- Incidence, prevalence, and survival of colorectal cancer in the United Kingdom from 2000-2021: a population-based cohort study 92%
- Nonendoscopic Detection Of Barrett’S Esophagus In Patients Without Gerd Symptoms 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Combining faecal immunochemical testing with blood test results to identify patients with symptoms at risk of colorectal cancer: a consecutive cohort of 16,604 patients tested in primary care 92%
- The Incidence of Immune Mediated Inflammatory Diseases Following COVID-19: a Matched Cohort Study in UK Primary Care 89%
- Neutrophil counts and cancer prognosis: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Development, Documentation and Validation of a Multistate Markov Model 92%
- Developing and validating polygenic risk scores for colorectal cancer risk prediction in East Asians 90%
- Cost-effectiveness of risk-stratified screening for cervical cancer in cohorts vaccinated against human papillomavirus with moderate vaccination coverage 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Molecular pathways in post-colonoscopy versus detected colorectal cancers: results from a nested case-control study 92%
- Diagnostic performance of the faecal immunochemical test for patients with low-risk symptoms of colorectal cancer in primary care: a service evaluation in the South West of England 90%
- Quantitative faecal immunochemical test for patients with high risk bowel symptoms: a prospective cohort study 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.