Back

Predicting the stage of gastric cancer after gastrectomy based on machine learning algorithms

Abdali, N.; Alavimanesh, S.; Ghazi, M. M.; Hadisadegh, S. N.

2025-04-09 health informatics
10.1101/2025.04.04.25325291 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundGastric cancer (GC) is the fourth most common cause of cancer death worldwide, with a 5-year survival rate of less than 40%. One of the most important methods for diagnosing stomach cancer is endoscopy, which is quite costly and invasive. The aim of this study was to develop machine learning-based diagnostic prediction models for the stage of GC. ObjectivesTo create a highly accurate predictive model for the stage of GC in patients via a noninvasive method based on machine learning (ML). MethodsIn this study, data from 996 patients with GC after gastrectomy were utilized. The data were split into groups, trained and tested, and a ratio of 8:2 was used to develop different machine learning models. Furthermore, the six different machine learning algorithms used in predicting the stage of GC include decision tree (DT), K nearest neighbor (KNN), logistic regression (LR), naive Bayes (NB), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM) methods. Results: The analysis of the demographic variables revealed statistically significant differences in the PLR and NLR and other parameters between the two groups of patients with stages I and III gastric cancer (P < 0.05). ResultsThe analysis of demographic variables revealed statistically significant differences in the PLR, NLR, and other variables between the two groups of patients with stages I and III gastric cancer, with a significance level of P-value < 0.05. Moreover, these findings suggest that the KNN model in this study is one of the best models for predicting the stage of GC.

Published in International Journal of Biological and Medical Research · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.