Neurosurgery and Artificial Intelligence: A Metric Analysis of Scopus-Indexed Original Articles (2014-2023)
Pinera-Castro, H. J.; Borges-Garcia, C.
Show abstract
IntroductionA comprehensive analysis of artificial intelligences (AI) integration into neurosurgery is vital to identify research priorities, address gaps, and inform strategies for equitable innovation. ObjectiveTo conduct a bibliometric analysis of Scopus-indexed (2014-2023) original articles at the intersection of AI and neurosurgery. MethodA descriptive metric study was conducted on 91 original articles, employing productivity, impact, and collaboration indicators. SciVal facilitated data extraction, while VOSviewer 1.6.11 enabled the mapping of co-authorship networks and keyword co-occurrence. IBM SPSS Statistics 27 was used to determine correlations between variables of interest (Kendalls rank correlation coefficient, statistically significant for p < 0.05). ResultsThe 91 articles accumulated 2,197 citations (24.1/article), reflecting rising productivity. Most highly cited works (2019-2023) were published in Q1 journals. Dominant neurosurgical areas included neuro-oncology (25.4%) and education (20.9%), with AI applications focused on diagnostic accuracy (20.9%) and predictive tools (17.6%). Citations correlated with author numbers (p = 0.007). World Neurosurgery led in publications (Ndoc = 11), while JAMA Network Open had the highest citations/article (88.7). Author, institutional, and country productivity correlated strongly with citations (p < 0.001). Collaboration was universal (international: 29.7%, national: 53.8%, institutional: 16.5%). ConclusionsThe analyzed scientific output exhibited a marked quantitative growth trend and high citation rates, with a predominant focus on leveraging AI to enhance diagnostic accuracy, particularly in neuro-oncology. Publications were concentrated in specialized, high-impact journals and predominantly originated from authors and institutions in high-income, technologically advanced Northern Hemisphere countries, where scientific collaboration played a foundational role in driving research advancements.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Introducing the EMPIRE Index: A novel, value-based metric framework to measure the impact of medical publications 93%
- Investigating the Nature of Open Science Practices Across Complementary, Alternative, and Integrative Medicine Journals: An Audit 93%
- COVID-19-related research data availability and quality according to the FAIR principles: A meta-research study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Diversity and inclusion: A hidden additional benefit of Open Data 93%
- Artificial Intelligence's Contribution to Biomedical Literature Search: Revolutionizing or Complicating? 90%
- Inferring Gender from First Names: Comparing the Accuracy of Genderize, Gender API, and the gender R Package on Authors of Diverse Nationality 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Publishing at any cost: a cross-sectional study of the amount that medical researchers spend on open-access publishing each year 93%
- Conceptualizing centers of excellence: A global evidence 93%
- Large language model-based information extraction from free-text radiology reports: a scoping review protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Researcher and Clinician Preferences for a Journal Transparency Tool: A Mixed-Methods Survey and Focus Group Study 91%
- Content-based image retrieval assists radiologists in diagnosing eye and orbital mass lesions in MRI 91%
- Beneficial influence of single-stage posterior surgery for the treatment of lumbar brucella spondylitis combined with spondylolisthesis 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.