The use of Artificial Intelligence in the out of hospital care setting: A Scoping Review.
Miles, J.; Brady, M.; Smith, L.; Cotterill, C.; Levey, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundOut of hospital services face significant challenges, including growing patient demand, workforce limitations, and evolving care pathways. Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies offer potential solutions, but their application in out-of-hospital settings remains inconsistently implemented and poorly understood. ObjectivesTo identify the types of AI technologies being applied in out-of-hospital settings, explore their purposes and implementation contexts, and examine associated outcomes. MethodsSix electronic databases were searched for English-language studies published between 2013-2024. Eligible studies involved AI technologies in the out-of-hospital emergency services setting. Data were synthesised according to five implementation domains: system level, dispatch zone, response zone, on-scene zone, and onward prognosis. ResultsFrom 236 publications, we identified diverse AI applications across the care pathway. System-level implementations (46 studies) featured AI for demand forecasting, optimal resource allocation, and strategic facility location, with demonstrated improvements in coverage efficiency of 10-20%. In the dispatch zone (32 studies), AI-enhanced emergency call triage and ambulance allocation reduced response times by up to 10-20%. Response-level applications (43 studies) included intelligent traffic management and real-time route optimisation, reducing travel times by 15-30%. On-scene zone implementations (75 studies) supported clinical decision-making with cardiac arrest rhythm detection, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) values exceeding 0.90 and acute coronary syndrome prediction sensitivities of 85-90%. Onward prognosis models (19 studies) predicted patient outcomes with AUC values of 0.80-0.90 for survival forecasting, enabling better resource allocation and early intervention. Further inferential analysis applications (21 studies) were also identified that provide higher-level insights through secondary analyses of out-of-hospital data. ConclusionsAI demonstrates significant potential across the care pathway, from operational optimisation to clinical decision support. Future development should focus on real-time adaptive systems, ethical implementation, improved data integration across the care continuum, and rigorous evaluation of real-time patient outcomes. Cross-disciplinary collaboration and standardised reporting of AI implementations will be essential to realise the full potential of these technologies in improving out-of-hospital care delivery. Key MessagesO_ST_ABSWhat is already known on this topicC_ST_ABSO_LIAI technologies show theoretical promise for enhancing out-of-hospital care services, but limited information exists about their implementation and real-world impact. C_LI What this study addsO_LIThis first comprehensive scoping review identifies a critical implementation gap: of 236 publications describing AI applications in out-of-hospital care, fewer than 15% report functional clinical deployments, and fewer than 5% document sustained implementation with evaluation. C_LI How this study might affect research, practice or policyO_LIOur findings suggest an urgent need to shift focus from developing novel AI applications to implementing and evaluating existing ones, addressing key barriers, including technical integration challenges, regulatory hurdles, evidence requirements, and organisational change management. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- From theoretical models to practical deployment: A perspective and case study of opportunities and challenges in AI-driven healthcare research for low-income settings 94%
- Development and preliminary testing of Health Equity Across the AI Lifecycle (HEAAL): A framework for healthcare delivery organizations to mitigate the risk of AI solutions worsening health inequities 93%
- Identification of predictive patient characteristics for assessing the probability of COVID-19 in-hospital mortality 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Emergency medicine patient wait time multivariable prediction models: a multicentre derivation and validation study 95%
- Evaluating the impact of a pulse oximetry remote monitoring programme on mortality and healthcare utilisation in patients with covid-19 assessed in Accident and Emergency departments in England: a retrospective matched cohort study 92%
- Accuracy of the National Early Warning Score version 2 (NEWS2) in predicting need for time-critical treatment: Retrospective observational cohort study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A method for rapid machine learning development for data mining with Doctor-In-The-Loop 93%
- Derivation and validation of a triage tool for acutely ill adults with suspected COVID-19: The PRIEST observational cohort study 92%
- Transparent comparisons of Emergency-Department prioritization policies: integrating tail risk, target attainment, and utility analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep ensemble multitask classification of emergency medical call incidents combining multimodal data improves emergency medical dispatch 93%
- The role of natural language processing in cancer care: a systematic scoping review with narrative synthesis 92%
- Building Large-Scale Registries from Unstructured Clinical Notes using a Low-Resource Natural Language Processing Pipeline 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.