Back

Mitochondrial Responses to Conventional and Ultra-high Dose Rate (FLASH) Radiation

Caggiano, E.; Lopez-Hernandez, A.; Waldrop, T.; Liu, K.; Gatica-Gutierrez, H.; Vargas-Hernandez, S.; Mims, N.; Acevedo-Diaz, A.; Velasquez, B.; Neil, D.; Aguilar, E.; Meyer, M.; Echeverria, G. V.; Koong, A.; Spiotto, M.; Gustavsson, A.-K.; Schueler, E. V.

2025-04-09 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.04.03.647049 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeUltra-high dose rate (>40 Gy/s, FLASH) radiation therapy (RT) provides equivalent tumor control while reducing normal tissue toxicity relative to conventional dose rate (CONV) RT. However, the mechanisms underlying the observed FLASH effect are unknown. We hypothesized that the preservation of mitochondrial integrity in nontumorigenic cells by FLASH RT could be a key factor in reducing normal tissue toxicity and improving overall treatment outcomes. MethodsWe examined mitochondrial health and function after CONV and FLASH in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo through assays of metabolic flux, mitochondrial membrane potential, mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS), mitochondrial DNA damage and copy number, mitochondrial morphology, and tumor growth and survival. ResultsIn in vitro assays, murine pancreatic cancer (PDAC) cells showed evidence of equal mitochondrial damage in response to CONV and FLASH, but nontumorigenic pancreatic cells were spared by FLASH. These results were recapitulated ex vivo, and mice treated with FLASH showed higher response rates and longer survival time than mice treated with CONV in an in vivo tumor model. ConclusionsCollectively, these results suggest that FLASH spares mitochondrial function in nontumorigenic cells, but not in PDAC cells, relative to CONV. The preservation of mitochondrial integrity in nontumorigenic cells may be a key mechanism underlying the reduced normal tissue toxicity observed with FLASH RT.

Published in International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics (predicted rank #4) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.