Learning the dynamic organization of a replicating bacterial chromosome from time-course Hi-C data
Harju, J.; Messelink, J. J. B.; Troeger, L.; Gradziuk, G.; Rathnayaka, I.; Thanbichler, M.; van Teeseling, M. C. F.; Broedersz, C. P.
Show abstract
Bacterial chromosomes are in continual motion as they undergo concurrent transcription, replication, and segregation. Time-course Hi-C experiments hold promise for studying chromosome organization across the cell cycle, but interpreting Hi-C data from dynamic systems remains challenging. Here, we develop a fully data-driven 4D Maximum Entropy approach to extract a model for the dynamic organization of a replicating bacterial chromosome directly from time-course Hi-C and microscopy data. After validating our 4D data-driven model model for Caulobacter crescentus against independent microscopy data, we infer quantitative information about changes in chromosome organization across the bacterial replication cycle. Our model reveals a sustained global linear organization of the C. crescentus chromosome during replication, as well as dynamic patterns of local chromosome extension induced by the replication forks. We use these data-driven inferences to constrain a mechanistic model for a replicating bacterial chromosome. Our model demonstrates that origin-pulling by a ParABS-like system, together with loop extrusion by condensin, can explain our inferred large-scale chromosome segregation patterns. The inferred replication-induced local changes in chromosome compaction, however, require additional mechanisms, which we attribute to replication-induced NAP unbinding and positive supercoiling. Overall, our work introduces a rigorous data-driven framework for quantitatively interpreting time-course Hi-C data, and offers new mechanistic insights into bacterial chromosome organization across the cell cycle.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.