Back

Light Impact on Thalamo-Cortical Connectivity During an Executive Cognitive Task: Effects of Time of Day and Specificities of Teenagers

Sharifpour, R.; Campbell, I.; Paparella, I.; Balda, F.; Beckers, E.; Mortazavi, N.; Koshmanova, E.; Read, J.; Collette, F.; Phillips, C.; Talwar, P.; Lamalle, L.; Zubkov, M.; Vandewalle, G.

2025-04-03 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.04.03.647005 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundLight affects not only vision but also attention, alertness, and cognition, primarily through intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells sensitive to blue-wavelength light. While previous research has shown that light influences brain regional activity, its impact on brain connectivity remains unclear. MethodsUsing 7-Tesla fMRI, this study examined how light illuminance modulates canonical left-lateralized verbal thalamo-prefrontal-parietal network connectivity during an auditory executive task. Fifty-five participants, including young adults (19-30 y, 23 Females: scanned in the morning or evening) and adolescents (15-18 y, 6 Females: scanned only in the evening), were studied. ResultsWe first found that across all the groups, moderate blue-enriched light strengthened parietal-to-frontal connectivity, while low-illuminance orange light enhanced thalamus-to-parietal connectivity. When focusing on time-of-day differences in young adults, we found that higher-illuminance blue-enriched light strengthened thalamus-to-prefrontal connectivity in the morning compared to the evening. When focusing on developmental stages differences, during the evening session only, we observe that moderate blue-enriched light enhanced thalamus-to-parietal connectivity in adolescents compared to young adults. ConclusionThese findings reinforce the view that the thalamus plays a key role in mediating the impact of light on cognition and the impact of light depends on the context of light administration, i.e. with timing and age.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.