Back

Dynamic modelling of EWS::FLI1 fluctuations reveals molecular determinants of phenotypic tumor plasticity and prognosis in Ewing sarcoma

Suresh, V.; Hafemeister, C.; Konstantinou, A.; Grissenberger, S.; Sturtzel, C.; Cidre-Aranaz, F.; Wenninger-Weinzierl, A.; Zylka, M.; Queiros, K.; Kurek, D.; Sastre, A.; Alonso, J.; Distel, M.; Obenauf, A.; Gruenewald, T. G. P.; Halbritter, F.; Kovar, H.; Fock, V.

2025-04-08 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.04.03.647002 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The mechanisms underlying tumor cell plasticity driving drug resistance and disease progression remain poorly understood. In Ewing sarcoma (EwS), variations in EWS::FLI1 (EF) activity have been associated with epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity (EMP). Using degron technology, we titrated endogenous EF in an EwS cell line and linked phenotypic states to distinct EF thresholds. Strikingly, modest EF depletion promoted a pro-metastatic phenotype, that diminished upon near-complete EF loss. Nascent RNA sequencing revealed distinct gene clusters with heterogenous response patterns to varying EF dosage. Target genes most sensitive to subtle EF depletion contained GGAA microsatellites in EF-bound enhancers. Furthermore, we identified Kruppel-like zinc-finger transcription factors associated with EF-repressed EMP genes. Transient EF depletion followed by rapid restoration to simulate oncoprotein fluctuations identified persistently dysregulated genes associated with poor prognosis. This study underscores the therapeutic challenge of insufficient EF inhibition and provides a foundation for exploiting oncoprotein dynamics to uncover therapeutic vulnerabilities in fusion-driven cancers. Beyond EwS, our results underscore the broader impact of oncoprotein dosage dynamics in cancers with otherwise quiet genomes. SIGNIFICANCEWe report EwS as a paradigm for the importance of oncogene fluctuations in tumor cell plasticity and disease progression. Effective therapeutic strategies must ensure complete EF depletion to prevent inadvertent metastasis.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.