Back

Fine-Grid Spatial Interaction Matrices for Surveillance Models with Application to Influenza in Germany

Stapper, M.; Funk, S.

2025-04-04 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.04.03.25325159 medRxiv
Show abstract

Accurate spatial forecasting of infectious disease outbreaks is critical for public health planning, yet models often rely on administrative boundaries that may not reflect true transmission patterns. We propose the Fine-Grid Spatial Interaction Matrix (FGSIM), which models transmission risk between districts based on distances between individuals to improve both forecast accuracy and spatial resolution of risk mapping. FGSIM creates district-level transmission matrices by defining individual-level transmission risk and aggregating to the district level. We transformed five distance metrics into contact intensity measures to create weight matrices within the endemic-epidemic modelling framework. We evaluated FGSIM using German influenza data (2001-2020) and compared its performance to established methods across four study regions for one to eight weeks ahead forecasts. FGSIM outperformed simplified variants and models without spatial dependence in most cases when evaluated in-sample. For one-week-ahead forecasts, a centroid-based model performed best in three of four regions. For longer-term forecasts, a circle-population based model consistently outperformed others. Risk maps at 100m resolution demonstrated FGSIMs ability to identify high-risk areas not aligned with administrative boundaries. FGSIM provides a flexible, computationally feasible approach to incorporating individual-level risk into district-level infectious disease models, showing competitive performance in forecasting and enabling fine-scale risk mapping for targeted public health interventions. AvailabilityAll data used are publicly available and summarised at https://zenodo.org/records/15600537. General functions to apply the methods are available in a toolbox at https://github.com/ManuelStapper/ FGSIM. Application-specific code is available at https://github.com/ManuelStapper/FGSIM_Application. Contact: manuel.stapper@lshtm.ac.uk Supplementary informationSupplementary data are available at Journal Name online.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.