Misdiagnosis and underdiagnosis of glioma: Systematic review
Ilchenko, D.; Zurrer, W. E.; Cannon, A.; Piccirelli, M.; Kulcsar, Z.; Winklhofer, S.; Ineichen, B. V.
Show abstract
BackgroundDiagnostic errors in gliomas, a major group of brain tumors originating from glial cells, can have severe consequences for patients and healthcare systems. Despite the serious implications of a glioma diagnosis, there is a lack systematic evidence on the frequency of diagnostic errors. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of misdiagnosis and underdiagnosis of gliomas and their potential impact. MethodsWe conducted a systematic review of English-language original studies, including those with more than 10 participants, reporting diagnostic errors in gliomas. A search of Medline and Embase was performed from inception until October 28, 2024. We evaluated the proportions of diagnostic errors and their potential consequences, and assessed the risk of bias using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. ResultsOf 1,860 studies screened, 22 met the inclusion criteria. Our analysis indicates that gliomas are frequently underdiagnosed (i.e., the correct diagnosis is missed) and, though less extensively reported, also misdiagnosed (i.e., assigned incorrect diagnoses). Overall, diagnostic errors ranged from 1.9 to 11.6% with a median of 5% (mis-/underdiagnosis: 5%, range 1.9-20%, misgrading: 11.6% range: 0.6-47%). While diagnosing gliomas is complex, evidence suggests that clinical tools such as MRI and pathological methods, including neuroendoscopic biopsy and specific cytology techniques, can achieve high diagnostic accuracy. Diagnostic errors were linked to relevant patient consequences, with both overtreatment and undertreatment commonly reported. ConclusionDiagnostic errors in gliomas are common and can have serious implications for patients. More rigorous data are needed to better understand the causes of these errors, which is key for reducing misdiagnosis and underdiagnosis in the future.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- MUC17 mutations and methylation are associated with poor prognosis in adult-type diffuse glioma patients 92%
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Future Promises, Perils, and Practicalities 90%
- Cerebrospinal fluid in COVID-19 neurological complications: no cytokine storm or neuroinflammation 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating soluble Axl as a biomarker for glioblastoma: a pilot study 93%
- Image-localized Biopsy Mapping of Brain Tumor Heterogeneity: A Single-Center Study Protocol 92%
- Alpha thalassemia/mental retardation X-linked (ATRX) protein expression in human pituitary neuroendocrine tumours and its reported correlation to prognosis and clinical outcomes: A systematic review 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Detection of local microvascular proliferation in IDH wild-type Glioblastoma using relative Cerebral Blood Volume 95%
- Connecting Patterns of Tumor Growth with Sex Differences in Extreme Survivorship for Primary Glioblastoma Patients 93%
- Temozolomide sensitivity of malignant glioma cell lines – a systematic review assessing consistencies between in vitro studies 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated Tumor Segmentation and Brain Tissue Extraction from Multiparametric MRI of Pediatric Brain Tumors: A Multi-Institutional Study 93%
- Evidence of supratentorial white matter injury prior to treatment in children with posterior fossa tumours using diffusion MRI 93%
- Early prognostication of overall survival for pediatric diffuse midline gliomas using MRI radiomics and machine learning 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A subset of pediatric thalamic gliomas share a distinct DNA methylation profile, H3K27me3 loss and frequent alteration of EGFR 90%
- A Novel Fully Automated MRI-Based Deep Learning Method For Classification Of IDH Mutation Status In Brain Gliomas 90%
- A Population Study of Clinical Trial Accrual for Women and Minorities in Neuro-Oncology Following the NIH Revitalization Act 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.