Back

Colorectum and Embedded Networks of Nerve Fibers Present Auxetic Responses During Uniaxial Circumferential Extension

Shokrani, A.; Seck, A.; Hoshino, K.; Feng, B.; Pierce, D. M.

2025-04-08 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.04.02.646859 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding the multiscale mechanics of the colorectum is essential for uncovering the mechanotransductive pathways underlying visceral nociception. Intraluminal distension of the large intestine reliably evokes pain in disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBIs), yet the tissue-level and nerve fiber-level responses to mechanical loading remain poorly defined. Here, we present results from a novel biomechanical testing framework that integrates uniaxial circumferential extension with high-resolution optical imaging to quantify deformation in both bulk colorectal tissue and embedded sensory nerve fibers. We tested intact, cylindrical colorectal segments from mice using a custom 3-D-printed chamber with intraluminal stainless-steel rods to apply circumferential stretch while maintaining a planar imaging field. We measured bulk-tissue deformation via Digital Image Correlation (DIC), while we assessed stretch in nerve fibers through fluorescence imaging of VGLUT2-labeled afferents analyzed using a custom fiber-network analyses. Across specimens, we observed a consistent auxetic response-characterized by positive axial strain during circumferential extension-at both the macroscale and microscale. Five out of six colorectal specimens exhibited positive axial Green-Lagrange strain (Exx), with an average median Exx of 0.0177, during circumferential extension generating an average median Eyy of 0.1273. Nerve fiber analysis across nine specimens revealed an average median stretch ratio of 1.0631, indicating 6.31% elongation, with substantial heterogeneity driven by fiber orientation. These findings demonstrate that the colorectum and its embedded network of nerve fibers exhibit auxetic behavior, a property that may amplify mechanical signaling and influence nociceptive signaling. Our methods and results provide foundational insight into structure-function relationships of colorectum and inform design of bioinspired auxetic materials.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Acta Biomaterialia
92 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
50.1%
50% of probability mass above
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 6%
8.8%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.2%
4
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
5
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
6
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
7
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
8
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
9
Biomaterials
84 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
10
Journal of Applied Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
11
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
12
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.1%
13
Small
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
14
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
15
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.0%
17
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
18
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
22
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
23
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%