Back

Epitope Expression Persists in Circulating Tumor Cells as Breast Cancers Acquire Resistance to Antibody Drug Conjugates

Mishra, A.; Abelman, R.; Cunneely, Q.; Putaturo, V.; Deshpande, A. A.; Bell, R.; Seider, E. M.; Xu, K. H.; Shan, M.; Kelly, J.; Huang, S.-B.; Gopinathan, K. A.; Kikkeri, K.; Edd, J. F.; Walsh, J.; Dai, C. S.; Ellisen, L.; Ting, D. T.; Nieman, L.; Toner, M.; Bardia, A.; Haber, D. A.; Maheswaran, S.

2025-04-03 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.04.02.646822 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) targeting cell surface proteins TROP2 or HER2 are effective in metastatic breast cancer, but the precise clinical contribution of epitope expression is uncertain. We prospectively monitored circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in 33 patients receiving ADC therapies using quantitative imaging. The expression of TROP2 and HER2 are heterogeneous across single CTCs from untreated patients, comparable to matched tumor biopsies, and display poor association with clinical response. Within three weeks of treatment initiation, declining CTC numbers correlate with a durable response (TROP2: median time to progression 391 versus 97 days, HR 4.15, P=0.0046; HER2: 322 versus 66 days, HR 9.12, P=0.0002). Neither TROP2 nor HER2 expression is reduced at progression, compared to matched pretreatment CTCs, and switching ADC epitope while maintaining a similar payload shows poor efficacy. Thus, epitope downregulation is not a common driver of acquired resistance to TROP2 or HER2 ADCs, and second-line ADC therapies may benefit from distinct payloads. SIGNIFICANCEADCs target tumor-associated antigens, followed by internalization and release of drug payloads. However, clinical studies of epithelial-targeting ADCs show efficacy despite low tumor epitope expression. Our finding that epitope downregulation does not commonly accompany acquired resistance suggests alternative drivers of clinical efficacy and the need for testing non-cross-resistant payloads to overcome resistance.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 10%
14.5%
2
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
3
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 27%
3.5%
5
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
6
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
7
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
9
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
10
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 21%
2.0%
11
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
12
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.9%
14
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.9%
15
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.6%
17
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
18
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
19
Journal of Experimental Medicine
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
21
Blood
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
23
npj Breast Cancer
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
24
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
Immunity
58 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
26
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
27
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
28
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%