Common and distinct neural mechanisms of aversive and appetitive pain-related learning
Li, J.; Schmidt, K.; Busch, L.; Forkmann, K.; Spisak, T.; Kaur, J.; Schlitt-Nguyen, F.; Wiech, K.; Bingel, U.
Show abstract
Appetitive and aversive conditioning are both fundamental to adaptive behaviour, yet there remains limited understanding of how they differ on the behavioural and neural level. We investigated the two processes during acquisition and extinction using functional magnetic resonance imaging and behavioural measures. In a within-subject differential conditioning paradigm (preregistration DRKS00027448), aversive learning was induced by pairing visual cues with a temperature increase (pain rise), while appetitive learning involved a temperature decrease (pain reduction). Valence and contingency ratings confirmed successful learning for both types of learning, though only the appetitive condition showed a return to baseline ratings during extinction, suggesting incomplete extinction in the aversive condition. On the neural level, both engaged the visual cortex during acquisition (with increased functional connectivity with the right frontal operculum) and the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) during extinction. However, aversive learning showed a stronger activation increase in the mediodorsal thalamus with heightened connectivity with the locus coeruleus during acquisition, as well as sustained parahippocampal activity during extinction. Moreover, incomplete extinction in the aversive condition (as indicated by contingency ratings) was associated with sustained activity in the visual cortex during pain anticipation. These results suggest that while appetitive and aversive learning share activation in regions involved in sensory processing (occipital lobe) and learning (vmPFC), aversive learning uniquely engages areas promoting rapid acquisition (mediodorsal thalamus and locus coeruleus) and cautious unlearning, in line with the notion of a better-safe-than-sorry strategy.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Rewarded extinction increases amygdalar connectivity and stabilizes long-term memory traces in the vmPFC 96%
- Differential contributions of ventral striatum subregions to the motivational and hedonic components of the affective processing of the reward 95%
- Effects of experiencing CS-US pairings on instructed fear reversal 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Unravelling the neurocognitive mechanisms underlying counterconditioning in humans 97%
- L-DOPA modulates activity in the vmPFC, Nucleus Accumbens and VTA during threat extinction learning in humans 96%
- Medial prefrontal cortex stimulation abolishes implicit reactions to threats and prevents the return of fear 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Individual differences in fear acquisition: Multivariate analyses of different Emotional Negativity scales, physiological responding, subjective measures, and neural activation 93%
- Observed but Never Experienced - Vicarious Learning of Fear Under Ecological Conditions 93%
- Divergent encoding of active avoidance behavior in corticostriatal and corticolimbic projections 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.