Back

Spatiotemporal organisation of residual disease in mouse and human BRCA1-deficient mammary tumours and breast cancer

Turos, D.; Decollogny, M.; Chanfon, A.; Siffert, M.; Romanens, L.; Tille, J.-C.; Tredan, O.; Labidi-Galy, I.; Valdeolivas, A.; Rottenberg, S.

2025-04-03 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.04.02.646768 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Breast cancer remains one of the prominent causes of death worldwide. Although chemotherapeutic agents often result in substantial reduction of primary or metastatic tumours, remaining drug-tolerant tumour cell populations, known as minimal residual disease (MRD), pose a significant risk of recurrence and therapy resistance. In this study, we describe the spatiotemporal organisation of therapy response and MRD in BRCA1;p53-deficient mouse mammary tumours and human clinical samples using a multimodal approach. By integrating single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), spatial transcriptomics (ST), and imaging mass cytometry (IMC) across multiple treatment timepoints, we characterise dynamic interactions between tumour cell subpopulations and their surrounding microenvironment. Our analysis identifies a distinct, drug-tolerant epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) cancer cell population, which exhibits a conserved expression program in human BRCA1-deficient tumours and significantly correlates with adverse clinical outcomes. We further reveal the spatial distribution of residual EMT-like tumour cells within specific anatomical niches, providing a framework for understanding the persistence of MRD and potential therapeutic vulnerabilities. These findings yield a comprehensive molecular roadmap of MRD, opening new avenues for therapeutic strategies targeting EMT-driven drug tolerance and tumour relapse.

Published in Nature Communications (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.