Back

Sex-biased computations underlying differential set shift performance in mice

Glewwe, N.; Dastin-van Rijn, E. M.; Chen, C. S.; Giglio, E.; Knep, E.; Ebitz, R. B.; Widge, A. S.; Grissom, N. M.

2025-04-03 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2025.04.01.646712 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cognitive flexibility can be defined as the ability to adaptively shift between choices or strategies based on environmental feedback and it is disrupted in numerous neuropsychiatric conditions. Individual differences in the computations supporting cognitive flexibility are poised to reveal mechanisms of neuropsychiatric risk and resilience. One critical variable well known to influence individual differences in neuropsychiatric risk is sex. While previous research has identified sex differences in value based decision making in mice, whether sex reflects a major source of variation in cognitive flexibility remains unknown. To directly assess sex-biased individual differences in cognitive flexibility, we developed a novel touchscreen Set Shift task that permits robust and continuous testing in mice. Using this task, we discovered that female mice completed significantly more rule shifts with fewer errors than males. We next employed a suite of computational models that revealed sex-biased individual differences in the computations underlying cognitive flexibility. Overall, our results suggest that following rule shifts, female mice learn the new rule faster and commit to exploiting rule choices sooner compared to males - sometimes because they commit to multiple rules simultaneously. This suggests that increased choice stability in female rodents enhances commitment to a strategy during periods of uncertainty and directly contributes to increased rule shifting. This supports the counterintuitive conclusion that a high degree of stable choice is a strong requirement for enhanced cognitive flexibility in the Set Shift task, one of the gold standard cognitive flexibility tasks.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.3%
2
Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 1%
9.0%
4
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.3%
6
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
9
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
10
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.5%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 21%
3.5%
12
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
13
Learning & Memory
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.0%
15
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
16
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
17
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
21
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
22
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Genes, Brain and Behavior
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
25
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Hormones and Behavior
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
27
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
28
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.7%
29
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
30
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%