Paleogene mass extinction and ongoing Neogene recolonization shape the tropical African flora
Mellado-Mansilla, D.; Weigand, A.; Weigelt, P.; Kreft, H.; Kessler, M.
Show abstract
Tropical regions are known to host most of the global biodiversity, yet species richness varies drastically between continents. Tropical Africa has long been recognized as the "odd man out", exhibiting lower plant diversity compared to other tropical continents, but the underlying causes remain debated. Here, we use ferns as a model group to explore the processes responsible for the low diversity of African plants. We find that the current fern diversity in Africa, particularly in humid regions, is up to 84% lower than under similar climatic conditions in the Americas and Asia. Unlike on these continents, where 55-60% of extant fern diversity is the result of in-situ diversification of Gondwanan lineages, only 16% of African fern diversity originates from such lineages. This discrepancy points to significant African extinction periods during the Paleogene and mid-Miocene, likely driven by elevated temperatures and aridification. In contrast, 54% of the extant African fern diversity can be attributed to approximately 530 intercontinental dispersal events during the Neogene, indicating ongoing recolonization of Africa. Our findings provide unprecedented insight into the evolutionary forces shaping plant diversity in tropical Africa and highlight the potential risks posed by ongoing climate change to its botanical heritage.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Phylogenomic insights into the first multicellular streptophyte 95%
- A genome-scale phylogeny of Fungi; insights into early evolution, radiations, and the relationship between taxonomy and phylogeny 94%
- Reticulate evolution and rapid development of reproductive barriers upon secondary contact pose challenges for species delineation in a forest fungus 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.