Persisters are primed for CRISPR-Cas adaptation
Mauritzen, J. J.; Wajn, A. S.; Hitz, I. F.; Hoeyland-Kroghsbo, N. M.
Show abstract
In the evolutionary battle between bacteria and mobile genetic elements, such as bacteriophage viruses and plasmids, bacteria have developed intricate defense systems. Among these, the CRISPR-Cas system has been extensively studied and harnessed as a revolutionary gene editing tool. However, while the biochemical process by which this microbial immune system acquires genetic CRISPR memory and immunity against invaders has been comprehensively examined, fundamental questions about the bacterial physiological state underlying how and when CRISPR memory is formed have only been partially explored. Naive CRISPR adaptation is generally rare, but occurs more frequently when bacteria are challenged with replication-deficient phages. In such scenarios, bacteria are not under immediate threat and have ample time to adapt to the phage DNA, without risking cell death. Accordingly, slow growth caused by low temperatures, low aeration, or bacteriostatic antibiotics promotes CRISPR adaptation, possibly by allowing the Cas complexes more time to adapt before being outpaced. Persister cells are dormant antibiotic-tolerant subpopulations of cells with limited metabolic activity. When a mobile genetic element invades a persister cell, its replication is halted until the host cell resumes growth, providing an ideal opportunity for CRISPR adaptation. Here, we show that transiently dormant Escherichia coli persister cells acquire CRISPR immunity 10-fold more frequently than the general bacterial population. Thus, persister cells, in addition to being notoriously antibiotic tolerant, are primed for CRISPR-Cas adaptation and may be in a state of heightened immune capacity and evolution, securing the survival of the population.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- How important is CRISPR-Cas for protecting natural populations of bacteria against infections by mobile genetic elements?? 96%
- A CRISPR-based genetic screen in Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron reveals a small RNA modulator of bile susceptibility 95%
- Genetic dominance governs the evolution and spread of mobile genetic elements in bacteria 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Toxin/Antitoxin Systems Induce Persistence and Work in Concert with Restriction/Modification Systems to Inhibit Phage 96%
- Molecular and evolutionary basis of O-antigenic polysaccharide driven phage sensitivity in environmental pseudomonads 95%
- Characterization of five environmental phages infecting Escherichia coli K-12 isolated during a phage biology training course 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of spacer and protospacer sequence requirements in the Vibrio cholerae Type I-E CRISPR/Cas System 96%
- Discovering the Molecular Determinants of Phaeobacter inhibens susceptibility to Phaeobacter phage MD18 95%
- Genes influencing phage host range in Staphylococcus aureus on a species-wide scale 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Species-scale genomic analysis of S. aureus genes influencing phage host range and their relationships to virulence and antibiotic resistance genes 95%
- CRISPR-Cas guided mutagenesis of chromosome and virulence plasmid in Shigella flexneri by cytosine base editing 95%
- Genome-wide CRISPRi screens reveal the essentialome and determinants for susceptibility to dalbavancin in Staphylococcus aureus 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.