Back

Improving hifiasm haplotypes for autopolyploid genome assemblies using constraint programming

Schiex, T.; Klopp, C.; Givry, S. d.; Durante, V.

2025-04-06 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.04.01.646355 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Actual versions of hifiasm often produce unbalanced haplotype contigs for autopolyploid genome assemblies. Adding a contraint on the distribution of proteins among haplotypes improves haplotype sizes and busco scores balances. Four species were used to benchmark this approach against hifiasm raw results. The script can be downloaded from https://github.com/chklopp/Separate_haplotypes_with_toulbar2.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Bioinformatics
○ 457 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.8%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Gigabyte
● 62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.8%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
3
Bioinformatics
◐ 1204 papers in training set
Top 3%
9.0%
Similar papers in this journal
4
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 27%
5.5%
Similar papers in this journal
5
BMC Genomics
○ 406 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
Similar papers in this journal
6
GigaScience
◐ 212 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
7
BMC Research Notes
○ 33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.9%
9
Genes
○ 144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
10
Briefings in Bioinformatics
◐ 354 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
11
F1000Research
○ 88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
12
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.1%
13
Bioinformatics Advances
◐ 203 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
14
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
◐ 351 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
15
Journal of Computational Biology
○ 48 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
16
Plant Methods
○ 42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
17
PeerJ
◐ 308 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.6%
18
Journal of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology
○ 15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
19
Peer Community Journal
● 281 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.