Back

A Living Organoid Biobank of Crohn's Disease Patients Reveals Distinct Clinical Correlates of Molecular Subtypes of Disease

Penrose, H. M.; Sinha, S.; Tindle, C.; Zablan, K.; Le, H. N.; Neill, J.; Ghosh, P.; Boland, B. S.

2025-04-03 gastroenterology
10.1101/2025.04.01.25325058 medRxiv
Show abstract

Current clinical decision-making is hindered by the absence of predictive preclinical models that faithfully bridge molecular diversity to patient outcomes. Here, we apply the principle of abstraction--deriving essential features from human tissues to build next-generation new approach methodologies (NAMs) that transform patient-derived organoids (PDOs) into predictive vehicles for Crohns disease (CD). From our living biobank of adult stem cell-derived colonic PDOs, we previously defined two molecular CD subtypes: Immune-Deficient Infectious CD (IDICD) and Stress and Senescence-Induced Fibrostenotic CD (S2FCD), each defined by unique genomic, transcriptomic, and functional profiles with matched therapeutic vulnerabilities. In this study, we prospectively anchored PDO-derived molecular phenotypes to real-world clinical outcomes, revealing that S2FCD maps to baseline and progressive colonic disease activity, whereas IDICD tracks with prior ileocecal surgery, penetrating disease behavior, as well as baseline and progressive ileal disease activity. By abstracting NAMs from human tissues and cycling insights between small- n organoids and Phase 3-sized datasets, this framework recasts PDOs as dynamic, predictive platforms that capture the past, present, and future of disease behavior. Beyond oncology, this work establishes PDOs as vehicles for prospective clinical trial-like studies in inflammatory diseases and highlights colonic immune dysfunction as a potential driver of ileal CD. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/25325058v3_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (68K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@3b0544org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d6d868org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@119a19corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1c11082_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
38.0%
2
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.5%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
5
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
6
Cell Stem Cell
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.1%
7
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.6%
8
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
9
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.8%
11
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
12
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
13
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
14
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.1%
15
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
16
Gut
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
17
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
18
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
20
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
22
Nature Cell Biology
99 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
23
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
24
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
25
Immunity
58 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
26
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%