Tracing the Shared Foundations of Gene Expression and Chromatin Structure
Liang, H.; Berger, B.; Singh, R.
Show abstract
The three-dimensional organization of chromatin into topologically associating domains (TADs) may impact gene regulation by bringing distant genes into contact. However, studies of TADs function and their influence on transcription have been constrained by ambiguities in TAD boundary definitions and challenges in directly measuring their regulatory effects. We overcome these limitations by developing species-level consensus TAD maps for human and mouse using a bag-of-genes approach that exposes emergent regulatory structure. To quantify TAD-mediated gene relationships, we leverage a generative AI foundation model computed from 33 million transcriptomes to define a contextual similarity metric, revealing higher-order gene relationships elusive to co-expression analysis. We find that TADs are regions of elevated gene co-regulation, and our analytical framework directly leads to testable hypotheses about chromatin organization across cellular states. We discover that the TAD-linked enhancement of transcriptional context is strongest in early developmental stages and systematically declines with aging. Investigation of cancer cells show distinct patterns of TAD usage that shift with chemotherapy treatment. Enhancing our understanding of cellular plasticity in differentiation and disease, these findings suggest that chromatin organization may act through probabilistic mechanisms rather than deterministic rules. Software availabilityhttps://singhlab.net/tadmap
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Developing a general AI model for integrating diverse genomic modalities and comprehensive genomic knowledge 98%
- Deciphering the 3D genome organization across species from Hi-C data 96%
- STAN, a computational framework for inferring spatially informed transcription factor activity across cellular contexts 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.