Back

Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccine booster doses in adults aged 50 years and over during the Omicron period in Victoria, Australia

Szanyi, J.; Yang, Y.; Zeng, J.; Clarke, C.; Buttery, A. K.; Blakely, T.

2025-04-01 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.03.31.25324986 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCountry-specific estimates of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) are important for policy making, but analyses of COVID-19 VE in Australia have been limited to date. MethodsWe used a modified Cox regression model to estimate the adjusted relative VE of three vs. two and four vs. three COVID-19 vaccine doses against hospitalisation and death due to COVID-19 among Victorians aged [≥]50 years after the emergence of the Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant through the linkage of national and state-wide health and administrative datasets. Analyses were conducted in two periods - 1 December 2021 to 19 June 2022 (Omicron BA.1/2 period; analyses of three vs. two doses), and 20 June 2022 to 7 November 2022 (Omicron BA.4/5 period; analyses of four vs. three doses). ResultsApproximately 1.8 million people were included in analyses of three vs. two doses and approximately 1.2 million people were included in analyses of four vs. three doses. Adjusted relative VE against death soon after boosting with a third dose (compared to two doses) in individuals aged [≥]65 years in the Omicron BA.1/2-dominant period reached 81.2% (95% confidence interval 76.9-84.6%). There was also evidence for a relative benefit of a third dose in the Omicron BA.1/2 period against hospitalisation and for a fourth dose in the Omicron BA.4/5 period against hospitalisation and death in this age group. In contrast, estimates of relative VE in the 50-64-year age group were highly imprecise. Conclusions: These results confirm the benefits of vaccine boosters in the Omicron era for those aged [≥]65 years, with the most notable gains evident from a third dose in late 2021 to mid-2022.

Published in Communicable Diseases Intelligence · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.