Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccine booster doses in adults aged 50 years and over during the Omicron period in Victoria, Australia
Szanyi, J.; Yang, Y.; Zeng, J.; Clarke, C.; Buttery, A. K.; Blakely, T.
Show abstract
BackgroundCountry-specific estimates of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) are important for policy making, but analyses of COVID-19 VE in Australia have been limited to date. MethodsWe used a modified Cox regression model to estimate the adjusted relative VE of three vs. two and four vs. three COVID-19 vaccine doses against hospitalisation and death due to COVID-19 among Victorians aged [≥]50 years after the emergence of the Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant through the linkage of national and state-wide health and administrative datasets. Analyses were conducted in two periods - 1 December 2021 to 19 June 2022 (Omicron BA.1/2 period; analyses of three vs. two doses), and 20 June 2022 to 7 November 2022 (Omicron BA.4/5 period; analyses of four vs. three doses). ResultsApproximately 1.8 million people were included in analyses of three vs. two doses and approximately 1.2 million people were included in analyses of four vs. three doses. Adjusted relative VE against death soon after boosting with a third dose (compared to two doses) in individuals aged [≥]65 years in the Omicron BA.1/2-dominant period reached 81.2% (95% confidence interval 76.9-84.6%). There was also evidence for a relative benefit of a third dose in the Omicron BA.1/2 period against hospitalisation and for a fourth dose in the Omicron BA.4/5 period against hospitalisation and death in this age group. In contrast, estimates of relative VE in the 50-64-year age group were highly imprecise. Conclusions: These results confirm the benefits of vaccine boosters in the Omicron era for those aged [≥]65 years, with the most notable gains evident from a third dose in late 2021 to mid-2022.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Vaccine effectiveness and duration of protection of Comirnaty, Vaxzevria and Spikevax against mild and severe COVID-19 in the UK 98%
- Waning of BNT162b2 vaccine protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection in Qatar 96%
- Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 infection among children and adolescents in Qatar 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative effectiveness of four COVID-19 vaccines, BNT162b2 mRNA, mRNA-1273, ChAdOx1 nCov-19 and NVX-CoV2373 against SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 (Omicron) infection 97%
- Implementation and Adherence to Regular Asymptomatic Testing in a COVID-19 Vaccine Trial 97%
- Effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccines against symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections in an urgent care setting 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Higher serological responses and increased vaccine effectiveness demonstrate the value of extended vaccine schedules in combatting COVID-19 in England 97%
- Waning of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies targeting the Spike protein in individuals post second dose of ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccines and risk of breakthrough infections: analysis of the Virus Watch community cohort 97%
- Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against Omicron and Delta hospitalisation: test negative case-control study 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Age and product dependent vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalisation among adults in Norway: a national cohort study, July – November 2021 96%
- Effectiveness of inactivated and Ad5-nCoV COVID-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA. 2 variant infection, severe illness, and death 95%
- Age and product dependent vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalisation among adults in Norway: a national cohort study, January – September 2021 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Vaccine effectiveness of two and three doses of BNT162b2 and CoronaVac against COVID-19 in Hong Kong 97%
- Effectiveness of one dose of MVA-BN smallpox vaccine against monkeypox in England using the case-coverage method 96%
- Initial protection against Omicron in children and adolescents by BNT162b2 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.