Associations Between Wearable-Derived Sleep and Physiological Metrics With Performance in Professional Golfers
Grosicki, G. J.; Hippel, W. v.; Fielding, F.; Kim, J.; Chapman, C.; Holmes, K. E.
Show abstract
PurposeConsistently performing at the highest level in golf requires a complex interplay of physiological and psychological attributes, with success often defined by razor-thin margins. Sleep characteristics and cardiac autonomic function, reflected by resting heart rate (RHR) and heart rate variability (HRV), are key indicators of recovery and readiness to perform. Yet, their relevance to elite golf performance remains largely unexplored. MethodsWe analyzed wearable-derived longitudinal data from 389 professional tour-level golfers across 521 competitive events (2017-2025), encompassing 35,140 nights of sleep and biometric monitoring. Key metrics included sleep duration (7.2{+/-}0.7hrs), sleep consistency (69.1{+/-}6.9%), RHR (55.9{+/-}7.9bpm), HRV (64.2{+/-}28.1ms), and a composite Recovery score (59.1{+/-}9.9%). Golf performance (total score, great shots, poor shots, strokes gained) was extracted from a subscription-based database. Linear mixed-effects models assessed both between-person differences and within-person season-to-season changes, adjusting for age (34.1{+/-}9.1yrs), height (1.81{+/-}0.07m), and weight (83.2{+/-}10.6kg). ResultsGolfers with superior sleep and biometric profiles consistently performed better, both between and within individuals (Ps<0.05). Between individuals, each additional hour of sleep was associated with a lower score (b=-0.522), as was a 10-percentage point increase in sleep consistency (b=-0.382), a 1bpm lower RHR (b=-0.038), and a 10-percentage point increase in Recovery (b=-0.476). Within athletes, season-to-season improvements in sleep consistency (b=-0.193 per 10-percentage points), HRV (b=-0.016 per 1ms), and Recovery (b=-0.238 per 10 percentage points) were also associated with lower scores (Ps<0.05). ConclusionsSleep and measures of cardiac autonomic function are associated with performance in elite golf. Both individual differences and within-athlete improvements were linked to success, highlighting the potential role of sleep, resting heart rate, and heart rate variability in optimizing performance at the highest level of sport.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Technological advances in elite marathon performance 94%
- Early morning run-training results in enhanced endurance performance adaptations in mice. 93%
- T-cell responses to acute cardiorespiratory or resistance exercise in cohorts of physically active or physically inactive older adults: A randomized complete crossover 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Muscle oxygenation maintained during repeated sprints despite inspiratory muscle loading 94%
- Area per player in small-sided games to replicate the external load and estimated physiological match demands in elite soccer players 94%
- The test-retest reliability and agreement between a fixed frame and belt-stabilised handheld dynamometer for isometric hip flexion and extension peak force measurement in recreational cyclists 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of Muscle Strength to Body Composition Measures using DXA, D 3 Cr, and BIA in Collegiate Athletes 93%
- Joint contact forces during barefoot, minimal and conventional shod running are highly individual 92%
- Adding carbon fiber to shoe soles does not improve running economy: a muscle-level explanation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effect of acute sleep deprivation on skeletal muscle protein synthesis and the hormonal environment 92%
- Submaximal eccentric resistance training increases serial sarcomere number and improves dynamic muscle performance in old rats 92%
- Young Adults Recruit Similar Motor Modules Across Walking, Turning, and Chair Transfers 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.