Smartphone-based behavioral profiling for distinguishing Dementia with Lewy bodies from Alzheimer's Disease
Revankar, G. S.; Salian, A. C.; Ozono, T.; Suzuki, M.; Kanemoto, H.; Shigenobu, K.; Nishio, Y.; Yoshiyama, K.; Yamamoto, Y.; Revankar, S. S.; Watari, A.; Furuya, K.; Ogasawara, I.; Yoshida, N.; Saeki, C.; Kajiyama, Y.; Nakatani, D.; Hashimoto, M.; Nagai, Y.; Ikeda, M.; Mori, E.; Nakata, K.; Mochizuki, H.
Show abstract
Background and ObjectiveDementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is frequently misdiagnosed as Alzheimers disease (AD) due to overlapping clinical presentations. In this study, we evaluated a smartphone-based digital platform that leverages behavioral markers to accurately differentiate between DLB and AD. MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study on 81 participants (Healthy controls = 40, AD = 21, DLB = 20), administering MMSE, and a smartphone-based noise pareidolia test (NPT) with integrated eye-tracking and speech inputs. Ground truth for patients were established using nuclear imaging (DAT-SPECT, IMP-SPECT, and/or MIBG). Core behavioral features such as response efficiency, gaze parameters (fixation count, saccadic patterns, surface area coverage) and acoustic features (latency, spectral properties) were extracted. A two-tiered classification system involving deep learning and support vector machine model was used. Based on the behavioral output, probability scores were generated with a focus on explainability to differentiate DLB from AD. Results and interpretationDLB group showed more pareidolias than AD group on the digital app. DLB patients exhibited several short saccades, inconsistent scanning behavior and smaller fixation dispersion, suggesting impaired top-down modulation of visual attention. However, fixation duration did not differ between AD and DLB. Vocal responses (latency, spectral properties) lacked specificity for DLB classification. Response fluctuation analysis revealed lower variability in AD patients compared to DLB. The app outperformed paper-based methods with 87% sensitivity and 93% specificity, and overall accuracy of 90% for AD-DLB classification. Two AD patients were classified as healthy controls (probability scores: 15%, 45%), likely due to early disease stage or unmeasured neurocognitive factors. ConclusionsBy effectively capturing core symptoms, our smartphone-based modality provides a reliable, scalable, and non-invasive tool for classification of DLB from AD. The integration of machine learning enabled precise quantification of behavioral microfluctuations between AD and DLB subtypes, underscoring its significant diagnostic potential. Future research is needed in refining classifiers to address early-stage cases and for disease staging.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of a speech-based AI system for early detection of Alzheimer’s disease remotely via smartphones 96%
- Relationship of plasma biomarkers to digital cognitive tests in alzheimer's disease 95%
- Clinical Validation and Machine Learning Optimization of MyCog: A Self-Administered Cognitive Screener for Primary Care Settings 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- ADataViewer: Exploring Semantically Harmonized Alzheimer’s Disease Cohort Datasets 94%
- Detection of dementia on raw voice recordings using deep learning: A Framingham Heart Study 94%
- An explainable self-attention deep neural network for detecting mild cognitive impairment using multi-inputbdigital drawing tasks 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A scoping review of remote and unsupervised digital cognitive assessments in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease 97%
- Interpretable deep learning approach for extracting cognitive features from hand-drawn images of intersecting pentagons in older adults 96%
- A Remote Digital Memory Composite to Detect Cognitive Impairment in Memory Clinic Samples in Unsupervised Settings using Mobile Devices 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Examining a Preclinical Alzheimer’s Cognitive Composite for Telehealth Administration, the tPACC, for Reliability between In-Person and Remote Cognitive Testing with Neuroimaging Biomarkers 95%
- An AI-assisted Online Tool for Cognitive Impairment Detection Using Images from the Clock Drawing Test 95%
- Screening for early-stage Alzheimer's disease using optimized feature sets and machine learning 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.