Facilitators and barriers when implementing antibiotic stewardship interventions in neonates at risk of early-onset sepsis
van Veen, L. E. J.; Janssen, S. W. C. M.; Tramper-Stranders, G. A.; Achten, N. B.; van Rossum, A. M. C.; Plotz, F. B.; Ista, E.
10.1101/2025.03.31.25324838 medRxivShow abstract
IntroductionAntibiotic stewardship is becoming increasingly important in neonatal care, given the impact of early antibiotic use on hospitalisation, short- and long-term health, and antibiotic resistance. To tackle these challenges, various antibiotic stewardship interventions have been developed. While neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) interventions have demonstrated potential to reduce and optimize antibiotic use, evidence regarding their implementation remains limited. In this study we aimed to identify barriers and facilitators of implementing three evidence-based antibiotic stewardship interventions in EOS care. MethodsInterdisciplinary focus group interviews were conducted with paediatricians, neonatal nurses, paediatric residents, midwives, primary care maternity nurses, microbiologists, pharmacists, and general practitioners. A semi-structured interview guide was used to discuss the EOS calculator, PCT-guided therapy, IV-oral switch therapy and current EOS care practices. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), consisting of 5 determinant domains (innovation, outer setting, inner setting, individuals, and implementation process domain), was used to guide the interviews and data analyses, using a rapid deductive content analysis approach. ResultsEleven focus group interviews were conducted with 81 participants. We identified 34 barriers and 20 facilitators. Most barriers concerned the inner setting (n=11), intervention characteristics (n=10), and the individual health professional level (n=8), while most facilitators were related to the intervention characteristics (n=8). Overarching barriers for implementing novel antibiotic stewardship interventions were external pressure to adhere to the national guidelines or affiliated academic regional protocols and the expected care shift towards healthcare workers with an already high workload. Universal dissatisfaction with the current national guideline and a hospital culture of evidence-based, patient-centred care in the presence of a strong opinion leader were reported as facilitators of implementing antibiotic stewardship interventions. ConclusionThis study identified barriers and facilitators influencing the implementation of three antibiotic stewardship interventions in neonatal EOS care. These determinants can be consolidated in the following themes: balancing quality of evidence with professional core values, managing care shifts and enhancing interdisciplinary communication, and conflicts with un-updated guidelines.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Indirect impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic at two tertiary neonatal units in Zimbabwe and Malawi: an interrupted time series analysis 94%
- Perceptions, views and practices regarding antibiotic prescribing and stewardship among hospital physicians in Jakarta, Indonesia 94%
- Mapping factors that may influence attrition and retention of midwives: a scoping review protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving the quality of in-patient neonatal routine data as a pre-requisite for monitoring and improving quality of care at scale: A multi-site retrospective cohort study in Kenyan hospitals 96%
- A qualitative study on factors influencing health workers’ uptake of a pilot surgical antibiotic prophylaxis stewardship programme in selected Georgian hospitals 95%
- Implementing essential diagnostics-learning from essential medicines: A scoping review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Process of Use of Evidence Products by Frontline Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Staff at the Facility Level in Ghana. 94%
- Identifying clinical skill gaps of healthcare workers using a digital clinical decision support algorithm during outpatient pediatric consultations in primary health centers in Rwanda 94%
- Caregivers’ and nurses’ perceptions of the Smart Discharges Program for children with sepsis in Uganda: A descriptive qualitative study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Essential Emergency and Critical Care – a consensus among global clinical experts 95%
- Rethinking Paediatric Sepsis Care through Local Provider Voices and Lived Systems: A Mixed-Methods Study in Two Hospitals in Ghana 94%
- Clinical prediction models to diagnose neonatal sepsis in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-adherence to surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines: findings from a mixed-methods study in a developing country 95%
- Healthcare associated infection risk analysis at the obstetrics and gynecology department of a referral hospital in Cameroon 93%
- Molecular surveillance reveals widespread colonisation by carbapenemase and extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing organisms in neonatal units in Kenya and Nigeria 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.