Back

Efficacy and Safety of Transcranial Temporal Interference Stimulation for Improving Negative Symptoms and Cognition in Schizophrenia: A Pilot Study

Wang, S.; Liu, N.; Chen, J.; Wang, L.; Liu, J.; Wang, L.; Wang, M.; Li, S.; Li, J.

2025-04-01 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.03.31.25324806 medRxiv
Show abstract

ImportanceSchizophrenia (SCZ) is a severe psychiatric disorder with limited treatment options for negative symptoms and cognitive impairment. Temporal interference stimulation (TIS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique that enables targeted deep brain modulation. However, its therapeutic effects on SCZ remain unexplored. ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of TIS targeting the right nucleus accumbens (NAc) in improving negative symptoms and cognitive function in patients with SCZ. DesignAn open-label, single-arm exploratory trial conducted from July 20 to October 30, 2024. SettingSingle-center study conducted at a tertiary psychiatric referral hospital (Tianjin Anding Hospital, China). Participants8 SCZ inpatients (mean age 48.3 {+/-} 12.1 years; 6 males) with persistent negative symptoms (PANSS negative subscale [&ge;]20) were enrolled. InterventionFive consecutive daily sessions of 20-minute individualized MRI-guided 130 Hz TIS targeting the right NAc. Main Outcomes and MeasuresPrimary outcomes: changes in PANSS negative subscale and SANS scores from baseline to two-week follow-up. Secondary outcomes: changes in MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) scores across assessment phases. Assessments occurred at baseline, post-intervention, and two-week follow-up. ResultsAll 8 participants completed treatment. PANSS total scores decreased by 8.1% (baseline: 64.5 {+/-} 14.8 vs follow-up: 59.3 {+/-} 15.7; padj = 0.007), driven by reductions in negative (baseline: 25.4 {+/-} 6.7 vs follow-up: 23.0 {+/-} 6.7; padj = 0.045) and general subscales. SANS scores declined by 12.5% (baseline: 57.8 {+/-} 9.4 vs follow-up: 50.6 {+/-} 12.9; padj = 0.045). MCCB total scores improved by 41.8% (baseline: 23.7 {+/-} 10.4 vs follow-up: 33.6 {+/-} 9.7, padj < 0.001), with significant gains in visual and verbal learning (padj [&le;] 0.02). Adverse events included electrode contact site pressure sensation (n = 4), transient current sensations (n = 4) and fatigue (n = 1). Tolerability was good. ConclusionThis pilot study suggests that TIS is a safe and feasible noninvasive deep brain stimulation technology that may alleviate negative symptoms and improve cognitive function in SCZ. Larger randomized controlled trials with extended follow-up periods are warranted to further validate these preliminary results. Trial RegistrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry; ChiCTR2400094200.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.