Back

Nanopore direct RNA sequencing (DRS) of MS2 bacteriophages in E.coli throughout its life cycle reveals a complex transcriptional activity to control and maintain its growth

Ni, N.; Burgio, G.

2025-04-02 microbiology
10.1101/2025.03.30.646209 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The RNA bacteriophage MS2 is an RNA phage that infects the bacterium E. coli and is one of the most studied and prototypical model phages in molecular biology and microbiology. Previous research revealed complex translational control and fine-tuning for MS2 replication. However, the dynamics of its transcriptional activity and replication during the life cycles within the bacteria remain elusive. Here, we employed Nanopore Direct RNA sequencing (DRS) to investigate the transcriptome and epitranscriptome landscape of the MS2 in infected E. coli throughout multiple life cycles. We discovered that MS2 phages sustain a high level of transcriptional activity required for replication. We found large amounts of subgenomic small transcripts from RNA degradation, Nanopore DRS bias, and transcripts containing the coat-encoding region, required for virion assembly. We found hybrid reads due to the error-prone activity of the MS2 replicase complex by the template-switching mechanism. We evidenced that RNA modification is conserved throughout the entire life cycle in full-length transcripts without the acquisition of new modifications, whereas small transcripts did acquire newly modified sites. The conserved sequence and secondary structure (U-rich hairpin) of {Psi} installation sites were the most amenable to RNA modification, and one site aligned well with host RluA-mediated installation. Overall, our investigation reveals a more complex transcriptional dynamics of MS2 phages than anticipated within E. coli to maintain its growth and replicate under host pressure.

Published in Virology Journal (predicted rank #24) · training set

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.