Back

Real-time spike sorting with 3D neural probe and triangulation localization

Yang, A.-C.; Zhang, J.-H.; Chen, K.-P.; Kao, K. H.; Lee, W.-J.; McLaughlin, M.; Chen, N.-Y.; Sun, J.-J.

2025-04-03 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.03.30.645752 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A key challenge in correlating neuronal activity with brain function is the limited sampling probability of neuronal activity in real time. It is crucial to increase the sampling probability substantially and in real time. We hypothesized that 3-dimensional (3D) neural probes offer faster and stronger prospects for cell yield than 2D electrode arrays. We simulated a 1000-neuron neuronal network, mimicking the granular layer of the barrel cortical column, recorded signals from inserted 384 electrodes (organized in 3D or 2D), and sorted units using Kilosrt or triangulation localization. We demonstrated that 3D electrode arrays converge more space for triangulation spike sorting than 2D probes do. 3D neural probes, together with triangulation, could isolate up to 80% of the simulated 1000 neurons (as ground truth) and have a cell yield of up to 5, which is, to the best of our knowledge, significantly higher than standard 2D electrodes with Kilosort or triangulation. With a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 10, which is close to the real world, the simulation data suggest that 3D electrode arrays in a face-centric cubic (FCC) arrangement provide a better cell yield. However, larger background noise (e.g. an SNR of 1, which can be improved with lower electrode impedance) has a stronger impact on the triangulation spike sorting. Since only the peak value of spikes are required for triangulation localization, the computing loading is much less than spike waveform-based spike sorting approach. Thus, combining 3D electrode arrays with triangulation localization is ideal for real-time spike sorting. Thus, we demonstrated that adding one more dimension in designing neural probes can dramatically increase cell yield and speed up isolating neuronal unit activity. We, for the first time, provide a tool for utilizing computer simulations to optimize the design of neural electrode arrays before time-consuming probe fabrication.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
38.8%
2
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.1%
50% of probability mass above
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 22%
5.0%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.1%
5
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.0%
6
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
7
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
8
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
9
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
10
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.4%
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
12
Neural Computation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
13
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
14
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
15
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.7%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.7%
18
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
20
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.5%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.5%
22
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%