Back

Prediction of preeclampsia by a combination of cell-free fetal hemoglobin, cell-free fetal DNA and maternal obstetric history

Nielsen, L. K.; Jakobsen, T. R.; Mortensen, S. J.; Ladelund, S.; Rieneck, K.; Clausen, F. B.; Bundgaard, J. R.; Dziegiel, M. H.

2025-04-01 obstetrics and gynecology
10.1101/2025.03.30.25324756 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe aim of the study was to investigate the combination of cell-free fetal hemoglobin (cfHbF), total cell-free hemoglobin (tcfHb), cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA), Pregnancy Associated Plasma Protein A (PAPP-A) and maternal obstetric history as potential markers in first and second trimester, for prediction of preeclampsia (PE) in asymptomatic pregnant women. MethodsThis was a retrospective case-control study of 589 pregnant women (560 in the control group and 29 with PE in the case group). We used routine blood samples used in screening for chromosomal anomalies and rhesus immunization to analyze the levels of cfHbF, tcfHb, and PAPP-A in gestational weeks 8-14 and levels of cfHbF, tcfHb, and cffDNA in gestational weeks 23-28. ResultsIn first-trimester samples, there was no statistically significant difference between controls, mild PE, and severe PE regarding levels of PAPP-A, cfHbF, tcfHb or cfHbF/tcfHb ratio. In second-trimester samples, cfHbF and cffDNA levels were significantly higher in PE cases than in controls. The odds ratio (OR) for developing PE was 4.28 (95%CI: 1.85-9.89) given a cfHbF>90th centile (p<0.001), and 6.55 (95%CI: 2.61-16.46) given a cffDNA level>90th centile (p<0.001). When adjusting for BMI and previous history of PE in a logistic regression analysis, only cffDNA and BMI remained statistically significant (p< 0.001). ConclusionWe found a significant association between PE and high levels of cfHbF and cffDNA in second-trimester samples, but no statistically significant difference in first-trimester samples were observed.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.