Performance characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 Isothermal Molecular Assay for point-of-care molecular diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2
Onwuamah, C. K.; Shaibu, J. O.; Amoo, S. O.; Ahmed, A.-R. A.; Abimbola, B. S.; Audu, R. A.; Salako, B. L.
Show abstract
BackgroundAccess to diagnostics was a significant challenge during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, as laboratory reagents, supplies, and consumables were in short supply and high demand. Central laboratories, equipped with advanced real-time PCR equipment and highly skilled staff, worked long hours to produce test results for travellers, hospital patients, and the general public. We developed a SARS-CoV-2 molecular diagnostic assay suitable for point-of-care testing to address this diagnostic challenge. MethodsRecombinase amplification coupled with fluorescent detection was chosen as the technology, as it was freely available. Using a mobile fluorescent detection device ensures foolproof results interpretation, point-of-care testing and minimal footprint in facilities. Designed as a one-step reverse transcriptase real-time isothermal assay utilising the FAM and ROX channels. Specimens were tested using commercially available real-time PCR assays to evaluate the performance characteristics of the assay. ResultsThe SARS-CoV-2 Isothermal Molecular Assay (SIMA) detects the SARS-CoV-2 ORF1ab gene and a human gene to differentiate poor specimen collection. SIMA runs at 40{degrees}C for 36 minutes, with the first six minutes dedicated to reverse transcription. It has a detection limit of 555 RNA copies/mL. Highly positive specimens are detected within three minutes, but the 30-minute run time allows for detecting low-positive Specimens. Sensitivity was 95%, with 100% specificity, while precision ranged from 4% to 6% ConclusionsWe report the performance characteristics of SIMA, the first molecular diagnostics developed in Nigeria for SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care diagnosis. Its performance and utility give hope for rapid diagnosis and treatment in resource-constrained settings.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Analytical and Clinical Comparison of Three Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Detection 98%
- Estimating the false positive rate of highly automated SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification testing 97%
- Test Agreement Between Roche Cobas 6800 and Cepheid GeneXpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 Assays at High Cycle Threshold Ranges 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Is the glass half full? Extraction-free RT-LAMP to detect SARS-CoV-2 is less sensitive but highly specific compared to standard RT-PCR in 101 samples 97%
- Comparison of Cepheid Xpert Xpress and Abbott ID Now to Roche cobas for the Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2 97%
- Evaluation of three rapid lateral flow antigen detection tests for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Recommendations for sample pooling on the Cepheid GeneXpert(R) system using the Cepheid Xpert(R) Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay 97%
- An international, interlaboratory ring trial confirms the feasibility of an open-source, extraction-less “direct” RT-qPCR method for reliable detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in clinical samples 97%
- Laboratory and field evaluation of the STANDARD Q and Panbio™ SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid test in Namibia using nasopharyngeal samples 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical evaluation of BD Veritor™ SARS-CoV-2 and Flu A+B Assay for point-of-care (POC) System 96%
- Real-time RT-PCR Allelic Discrimination Assay for Detection of N501Y Mutation in the Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2 Associated with Variants of Concern 96%
- Performance of the Cue COVID-19 Molecular Test for Point of Care: Insights from a multi-site clinic service model 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of seven different rapid methods for nucleic acid detection of SARS-COV-2 virus 96%
- Real-life performance of a novel antigen detection test on nasopharyngeal specimens for SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosis: a prospective study 96%
- Validation and Performance Comparison of Three SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Assays 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.