Back

In-Silico Stability Predictors: Investigation of Performance Towards balanced Experimental Data

Degn, K.; Utichi, M.; Besora, P. S.-I.; Tiberti, M.; Papaleo, E.

2025-04-02 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.03.28.645695 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Change in protein stability, quantified as the change in Gibbs free energy of folding ({Delta}{Delta}G) in kcal/mol, plays a crucial role in functional alterations of proteins, with misfolding and destabilization commonly associated with pathogenicity. The past two decades have brought the development of bioinformatics tools leveraging evolutionary knowledge, empirical force fields, and machine learning to predict stability alterations. However, existing tools are often optimized towards or trained on limited experimental data, leading to unbalanced datasets and potential overfitting. The research objective is to benchmark selected stability predictors using an unbiased and balanced dataset, with AlphaFold structures as input. We demonstrate a performance decline when balancing data across amino acids, stabilizing and destabilizing mutations, and protein representatives, highlighting that redundancy alone is insufficient for benchmarking correction. Additionally, we illustrate that a protein structure ensemble from molecular dynamics acts as a superior input compared to a single static structure. At the same time, coarse-grained methodologies tend to decrease the output quality.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.