Back

The confounding effects of skin colour in photoacoustic imaging

Else, T.; Loreno, C.; Groves, A.; Cox, B.; Gröhl, J.; Modolell, I.; Bohndiek, S.; Roshan, A.

2025-03-30 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2025.03.28.25324605 medRxiv
Show abstract

Skin colour is known to confound readouts from optical devices that make measurements through the skin, which can adversely impact the care of patients with darker skin. Photoacoustic imaging (PAI) is making its way from the laboratory to the clinic, however, combining optics and ultrasound for deep tissue imaging leads to a complex relationship between photoacoustic-derived imaging biomarkers and skin melanin concentration. Furthermore, no generalisable correction of the confounding effects of skin colour in PAI has been demonstrated. We sought to overcome this limitation by recruiting a healthy volunteer cohort with the most diverse range of skin tones ever assembled in the field, with participants from Fitzpatrick types I to VI and with vitiligo. From this comprehensive dataset, we identified and characterised two physical mechanisms responsible for skin colour-dependent degradation in both image quality and biomarker quantification. Accompanied by detailed theoretical modelling, we demonstrated that strong light absorption by melanin leads to spectral colouring, which dominates in individuals with low skin melanin pigmentation. We further identified the backscattering of ultrasound waves generated in the skin as a major source of image artefacts for individuals with high skin melanin pigmentation. With this improved understanding of the physical basis, we were able to develop a fast and practicable correction method for spectral colouring and adapted a plane-wave ultrasound reconstruction algorithm to reveal the ultrasound scatterer distribution encoded in the photoacoustic timeseries. Our findings highlight the need for more advanced image reconstruction methods to enable equitable clinical application of PAI. One Sentence SummaryPhotoacoustic imaging is proven to suffer from measurement inaccuracies in people with darker skin, which could adversely impact patient care if not appropriately corrected.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 2%
13.3%
2
Photoacoustics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
3
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
4
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.9%
5
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Biomedical Optics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
7
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.3%
8
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
9
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.7%
10
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.2%
11
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
12
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
13
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
14
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.2%
15
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
16
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
17
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.1%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.0%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.0%
20
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
21
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
23
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
Physics in Medicine & Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
26
JBMR Plus
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%