IMAGINATOR 2.0: Co-design and early evaluation of a novel blended digital intervention targeting self-harm in young people
Servi, A.; Bougard-Gardner, E.; Mohamed, S.; McDermott, A.; Chowdury, N.; Van Zalk, N.; Hampshire, A.; Dewa, L. H.; Di Simplicio, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundSelf-harm (SH) affects around 20% of all young people in the UK. Treatment options for self-harm remain limited and those available are either non-specific or long and costly and may not suit all young people. There is an urgent need to develop new scalable interventions to address this gap. IMAGINATOR is a novel imagery-based intervention targeting self-harm initially developed for 16- to 25-year-olds. It is a blended digital intervention delivering Functional Imagery Training (FIT) via therapy sessions and a smartphone app. In this study, we piloted a new version of IMAGINATOR extended to adolescents from age 12 after co-producing a new app with a diverse group of young people experts-by-experience. Here we report on feasibility of delivering IMAGINATOR 2.0 in secondary mental health services and clinicians feedback on the intervention. MethodsParticipants were recruited from West London NHS Trust Tier 2 CAMHS and adult Mental health Integrated Network Teams (MINT) teams. They received three face-to-face FIT sessions in which the app was introduced followed by five brief phone support sessions. Outcome assessments were conducted after completing therapy, approximately 3 months post-baseline. Two focus groups were conducted to gather the therapists perspectives on the IMAGINATOR 2.0 intervention. For quantitative data, descriptives are reported. Qualitative data were analysed using a co-produced thematic analysis method with lived experience co-researchers. ResultsEighty-three participants were referred and 29 (28 female, 1 transgender, mean age = 18.9) were eligible and completed screening. Out of 27 participants who started, 59% completed therapy per protocol while only 15 completed the quantitative outcome assessment. There was an overall reduction in number of SH episodes over 3-months from pre-to post-intervention (baseline: median = 6.5, IQR = 35; post-intervention: median = 0, IQR = 7; median diff = -6.5, r = 0.69). Five themes were identified through analysis of therapists feedback, including therapy impact, mental imagery efficacy and limitations and need for better integration of the IMAGINATOR 2.0 app with therapy sessions. The app was overall well received, and therapists highlighted the need for an intervention like IMAGINATOR in their services. ConclusionWe show that IMAGINATOR can be extended to adolescents, is acceptable and has potential as a brief intervention reducing self-harm in young people under mental health services. A future RCT is needed to robustly test the intervention efficacy, after considering issues around high attrition in outcome measures.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A One-Arm Pilot Trial of a Telehealth CBT-Based Group Intervention Targeting Transdiagnostic Risk for Emotional Distress 96%
- Service user experiences and views regarding telemental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a co-produced framework analysis 95%
- Service user experiences of community services for Complex Emotional Needs: A qualitative thematic synthesis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of Goal Management Training + (GMT + ) for Methamphetamine Use Disorder Through Collaborative Design: A Process Description 96%
- Priorities for Future Research about Screen Use and Adolescent Mental Health: A Participatory Prioritization Study 95%
- Recovery from severe mental health problems: A systematic review of service user and informal caregiver perspectives 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Treatment provision for adults with ADHD during the COVID-19 pandemic: An exploratory study on patient and therapist experience with on-site sessions using face masks vs. telepsychiatric sessions 96%
- Implementing an Advance Choice Documents resource for Black African and Caribbean people with experience of compulsory psychiatric admission 94%
- Current state of the evidence on community treatments for people with complex emotional needs: a scoping review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of attexis, a Digital Intervention Based on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adults with ADHD: A Randomized Controlled Trial 93%
- Approaches to improve mental health care for autistic children and young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis 92%
- Tracking the mental health of home-carers during the first COVID-19 national lockdown: evidence from a nationally representative UK survey 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- “You’re just there, alone in your room with your thoughts” A qualitative study about the impact of lockdown among young people during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
- A Mobile App for Prolonged Grief among Bereaved Parents: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial 95%
- While they wait: A cross-sectional survey on wait times for mental health treatment for anxiety and depression for Australian adolescents 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.