Back

Modeling Masticatory Myalgia to Headache-like Referred Pain Triggers Local Gene Plasticity at Referred Pain Sites

Hovhannisyan, A. H.; Aldape, J.; Mecklenburg, J. M.; Alfaro, J. J.; Zou, Y.; Lai, Z.; Guo, W.; Yang, J.; Ernberg, M.; Boada, D. M.; Akopian, A.

2025-03-31 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.03.26.645551 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Patients with myofascial pain in the head and neck area report widespread and referred pain, including headache. Existing preclinical models fail to replicate this clinical phenotype; therefore, we aimed to develop animal models mimicking referred pain phenomenon and investigate whether referred pain leads to gene plasticity at the referred sites. We modeled masticatory myalgia by stimulation of either the masseter (MM) or temporal muscle (TM) in mice. MM and TM were stimulated with a single high-dose injection of Collagenase-type II (Col), repetitive low-dose Col injections, repetitive gentle MM stimulation, or single or repetitive forceful mouth opening. Referred pain was assessed by measuring mechanical hypersensitivity in the periorbital area (representing headache-like behavior) and another masticatory muscle. Stimulation of the MM, whether through single or repetitive Col injections or mouth opening, produced inconsistent, short-lasting (1-2 days) headache-like behavior in both males and females. In contrast, stimulation of the TM, using different paradigms, triggered mechanical hypersensitivity in both the MM and the periorbital area. Referred headache-like behavior lasted longer in females compared to males, while referred myalgia in the MM was pronouncer in males. The referred pain in the MM and periorbital areas triggered by TM stimulation was associated with significant gene plasticity in the MM and dura mater. Transcriptional changes in the MM following Col injection into the TM resembled those observed after direct MM injections. Presented data imply that referred pain modeled by TM stimulation could be accounted by nociceptive signaling from multiple local sites involved in this referred pain network.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
The Journal of Headache and Pain
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
3
The Journal of Pain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.4%
5
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.7%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
7
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
8
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
9
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
10
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.0%
12
British Journal of Pharmacology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
13
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
14
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
15
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
17
Pharmacological Research
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
18
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
19
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
20
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%
21
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.7%
22
Journal of Comparative Neurology
66 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%
23
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
24
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
25
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%