Back

Prioritizing Neglected Food Species in Nutritional Studies Using Expert-Knowledge and Explainable AI

Jacob, M. C. M.; Carvalho, A. M. d.; Batista, A. G.; Santos Junior, A. d. F.; Carioca, A. A. F.; Morais, C. M. M. d.; Cazarin, C. B. B.; Tregidgo, D.; Oliveira, D. V. B. d.; Marchioni, D. M. L.; Giuntini, E. B.; Menezes-Neto, E. J. d.; Pereira, F. d. O.; Moura, G. d. F.; El Bizri, H. R.; Bezerra, I. W. L.; Aquino, J. d. S.; Silva, J. V. M.; Steluti, J.; Silva-Maia, J. K. d.; Teixeira, J. A.; Silva, L. J. G. d.; Campos, L. Z. d. O.; Oliveira, M. A.; Oliveira, M. E. G. d.; Drewinski, M. d. P.; Norde, M. M.; Menolli, N.; Lopes, P. F. M.; Silva, R. R. V. d.; Alves, R. R. N.; Silva, S. C. G. d.; Go

2025-03-31 ecology
10.1101/2025.03.26.645402 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Food biodiversity is vital for human health and sustainable food systems. However, research on neglected and underutilized species is limited by funding, uneven research capacity, and the challenge of balancing ecological, cultural, and public health considerations, requiring innovative prioritization approaches. Using Brazil as a model, this study inventories 369 neglected food species across algae, aquatic fauna, wild terrestrial vertebrates, insects, mushrooms, and plants. A mixed-methods approach, combining expert knowledge and explainable AI (LightGBM and SHAP value analysis), identified key factors for prioritizing species for food composition and consumption studies. The inventory is dominated by plants (29.5%) and wild vertebrates (24.4%), with major nutritional data gaps, particularly for algae, insects, and wild vertebrates. Over 36,000 recipes using neglected species were identified. In both food composition (R{superscript 2}: 0.677) and consumption studies (R{superscript 2}: 0.782) recipe number and species occurrence across different states were the most influential features predicting prioritization. These findings emphasize the role of cultural uses and local accessibility in shaping nutritional research priorities. We urge increased research on neglected species to bridge data gaps and integrate them into food systems, promoting sustainable diets in Brazil and other tropical regions.

Published in Scientific Reports (predicted rank #3) · training set

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.