Back

AlphaFold3 and RoseTTAFold All-Atom structures enable radiosensitizers discovery by targeting multiple DNA damage repair proteins

Tong, J.; Wang, X.; Lu, M.; Wang, T.; Chen, J.; Chen, J.; Li, Y.; Xie, C.; Fu, Y.; Yu, C.

2025-05-13 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.03.26.645385 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Radioresistance remains a primary obstacle in tumor radiotherapy, with no clinically approved radiosensitizers due to toxicity concerns. To identify effective and safe radiosensitizers, a natural products database containing 79,263 compounds are docked against a hybrid target library of four DNA damage response (DDR)-related proteins, comprising both experimental and artificial intelligence (AI)-predicted structures generated by AlphaFold3 and RoseTTAFold All-Atom models. Retrospectively, AI-modeled structures show comparable AUC and logAUC values to experimental structures. Prospectively, compounds screened by AI-modeled structures versus those by experimental structures exhibit limited overlap, e.g., 10% for ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), 22.2% for ATM- and Rad3-related (ATR), 7.7% for DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs), and 40% for Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1). This highlights structural complementarity of AI-modeled structures when docking against small-scale compound libraries. Two compounds exhibiting lower binding free energy than the DNA-PKcs co-crystallized ligand were selected and validated as effective radiosensitizers in tumor cells. Proteomic analyses reveal shared DDR dysregulation but distinct repair pathway vulnerabilities behind both compounds, which activate TP53-associated apoptosis and senescence as cellular endpoints by modulating the synergistic interplay between DDR and spindle checkpoints. These findings highlight their potential as context-dependent radiosensitizers, providing novel candidates and strategies to overcome tumor radioresistance.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecules
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.1%
2
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.9%
3
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
4
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.5%
5
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.1%
6
Cell Death & Disease
126 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.5%
8
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.8%
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.5%
11
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
12
Biomolecules
100 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
172 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
14
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
15
Communications Chemistry
48 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
16
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
76 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
17
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
18
Chemical Research in Toxicology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
19
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.1%
20
Redox Biology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
21
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
102 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
24
Pharmaceuticals
34 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
25
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
77 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
26
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.8%
27
ACS Chemical Biology
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Journal of Cheminformatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
29
Biomedicines
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
30
Life Sciences
27 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%