Back

Pathways to optimize a pediatric telemedicine and medication delivery service: A multi-level qualitative study in Haiti

Garilus, F. E.; Cassion, K.; Cajusma, Y.; Flaherty, K. E.; Beausejour, J. R.; Exantus, L.; Beau de Rochars, V. M.; Baril, C.; Becker, T. K.; Rosen, R. K.; Nelson, E. J.; Klarman, M. B.

2025-03-27 pediatrics
10.1101/2025.03.26.25324692 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundWhile telemedicine has become an established component of healthcare delivery globally, challenges to scaling emerging initiatives persist across multiple levels. Over the last 5 years, our team has developed a pediatric telemedicine and medication delivery service (TMDS) in Haiti that integrates clinical guidance with rapid access to medications. Building on successful proof-of-concept studies, we are now well positioned to characterize both general challenges to telemedicine scale-up and those unique to the TMDS model. MethodsIn this study, we conducted focus group discussions and administered written questionaries to TMDS staff, including physicians, nurses, and medication delivery drivers. Using framework matrix analysis we identified key challenges and opportunities associated with the TMDS model. ResultsAreas for improvement related to obtaining quality information from virtual exams, the reliability of technology and communication infrastructure, conditions necessary for effective in-person exams, the limited scope of the TMDS workflow and clinical resources, and uncertainty surrounding long-term sustainability. These insights informed the development of targeted action items categorized into three domains: conceptual, physical and mission-oriented. ConclusionThe findings will guide our internal scale-up strategy and may offer guidance to similar telemedicine initiatives.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.