Back

Human sensory neurons exhibit cell-type-specific, pain-associated differences in intrinsic excitability and expression of SCN9A and SCN10A

Yi, J.; Yang, L.; Widman, A. J.; Toliver, A.; Bertels, Z.; Del Rosario, J. S.; Slivicki, R. A.; Payne, M.; Dourson, A. J.; Li, J.-N.; Kumar, R.; Gupta, P.; Mwirigi, J. M.; Chamessian, A.; Lemen, J.; Copits, B. A.; Gereau, R. W.

2025-03-26 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.03.25.645367 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Despite major advances in pain science, the approval of novel therapeutics has been slow. A major cause for the lack of new analgesics may be fundamental biological differences between humans and model organisms used in preclinical research. Large-scale transcriptional profiling efforts on human dorsal root ganglia (hDRG) have now identified at least 22 distinct neuronal subtypes; however, a significant knowledge gap exists in ascribing functional phenotypes to these diverse neuronal populations. In this study, we use Patch-seq recordings in hDRG to link electrical properties to transcriptionally defined cell types. First, through unbiased clustering of electrophysiological properties from 228 hDRG neurons, we identify three electrophysiological subtypes (E-types). Next, we show that E-types can be mapped onto specific transcriptional classes (T-types) of hDRG neurons. We find that donors pain history is associated with E-type-specific differences in electrical properties, some of which may be associated with higher expression of voltage-gated sodium channels, NaV1.7 and NaV1.8. These results highlight the importance of using multimodal profiling to better understand human sensory neuron biology and may help reveal novel therapeutic targets driving chronic pain. TeaserMapping electrical properties to transcriptional profiles of human sensory neurons offers new insights into pain neurobiology

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.