Back

Rare Jackpot Individuals Drive Rapid Adaptation in Threespine Stickleback

Kwakye, A.; Reid, K.; Wund, M. A.; Heins, D. C.; Bell, M. A.; Veeramah, K. R.

2025-03-26 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2025.03.25.642177 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Recombination has long been considered the primary mechanism to bring beneficial alleles together, which can increase the speed of adaptation from standing genetic variation. Recombination is fundamental to the transporter hypothesis proposed to explain precise parallel adaptation in Threespine Stickleback. We studied an instance of freshwater adaptation in the Threespine Stickleback system using whole genomic data from an evolutionary time series to observe the genomic dynamics underlying rapid parallel adaptation. Our experiment showed that rapid adaptation to a freshwater environment depended on a few individuals with large haploblocks of freshwater-adaptive alleles (jackpot carriers) present among the anadromous (i.e., sea-run) founders at low frequencies. Biological kinship analyses indicate that mating among jackpot carriers and between jackpot carriers and non-jackpot individuals led to a rapid increase in freshwater-adaptive alleles within the first few generations. This process allowed the population to overcome a substantial bottleneck likely caused by the low fitness of first-generation stickleback with a few freshwater-adaptive alleles born in the lake. Additionally, we found evidence that the genetic load that emerged from population growth after the bottleneck may have been reduced through an increase in homozygosity by inbreeding, ultimately purging deleterious alleles. Recombination likely played a limited role in this case of very rapid adaptation.

Published in Nature Communications (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.