Back

Prenatal Exposure to Gestational Diabetes Mellitus is Associated with Greater Pre-pubertal BMI Growth and Faster Post-pubertal Cortical Thinning During Peri-adolescence

Hsu, E.; Pickering, T. A.; Luo, S.

2025-03-26 endocrinology
10.1101/2025.03.25.25324581 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe longitudinal trajectory of body mass index (BMI) and brain structure development during peri-adolescence is not clearly defined in offspring prenatally exposed to gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) vs. un-exposed offspring. MethodsParticipants between age 9 and 10 years (N=9,583) were included from the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study and followed yearly though 4-year follow-up. GDM and puberty status were self-reported. BMI was calculated yearly, and MRI assessed brain structure biennially. Mixed-effects models analyzed trajectories of BMI and brain structural measures between groups controlling for sociodemographic covariates, and linear spline was defined with a knot at onset of puberty. ResultsThere was an interaction of exposure by age in change in BMI [{beta} (95% CI) = 0.032 (0.008, 0.056), P=0.009] and mean cortical thickness [{beta} (95% CI) = -0.038 (-0.071, -0.004), P=0.027]. The former was driven by greater pre-pubertal increases in BMI [{beta} (95% CI) = 0.051 (0.002, 0.100), P=0.043], whereas the latter was driven by faster post-pubertal declines in cortical thickness among GDM-exposed offspring [{beta} (95% CI) = -0.051 (-0.095, -0.007), P=0.046]. ConclusionPrenatal GDM exposure is associated with greater pre-pubertal increases in BMI and faster post-pubertal cortical thinning in youth age between 9 and 15. Practitioner Points- Prenatal GDM exposure is associated with greater pre-pubertal increases in BMI and faster post-pubertal cortical thinning in youth age between 9 and 15. - It is important to recognize puberty as a window of vulnerability for altered brain development among youth prenatally exposed to GDM.

Published in Pediatric Obesity · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.