Back

Genetic variants risk assessment for Long QT Syndrome through machine learning and multielectrode array recordings

Khudiakov, A.; Mura, M.; Giannetti, F.; Leonov, V.; Alberio, C.; Eskandr, M.; Brink, P. A.; Crotti, L.; Gnecchi, M.; Schwartz, P. J.; Sala, L.

2025-03-26 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2025.03.25.25324187 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundLong QT syndrome (LQTS) is a life-threatening genetic disorder characterized by prolonged QT intervals on electrocardiograms. Congenital forms are mostly associated with variants in the KCNQ1 and KCNH2 genes. Among pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants, some are associated with a significantly higher incidence of cardiac events compared to others. While therapies have significantly reduced mortality, some patients are unresponsive or intolerant to therapy, perpetuating their arrhythmic risk, including sudden cardiac death. Current approaches for risk stratification are insufficient, highlighting the critical need for more accurate identification and management of patients carrying high risk genetic variants. ObjectivesTo develop a refined risk stratification model for P/LP variants by applying machine learning classification to electrophysiological data measured in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs). MethodsEleven patient-specific hiPSC lines carrying six P/LP variants in KCNQ1 or KCNH2 were differentiated to cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs). Electrophysiological responses from multielectrode array recordings at baseline and after application of selective ion channel blockers or pro-arrhythmic compounds were used to train a machine learning model to classify variant-specific risk levels based on in vitro electrophysiological readouts. ResultsOur findings revealed a correlation between variant risk level, hiPSC-CM electrophysiological profiles, and drug responses. The machine learning classifier, trained on multielectrode array recordings, achieved 89% accuracy in classification of P/LP genetic variants according to the associated risk levels. ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that integrating hiPSC-CM electrophysiological profiling with machine learning provides a robust method to improve variant-specific risk stratification for LQTS patients. Clinical PerspectivesO_ST_ABSClinical AspectsC_ST_ABSUnderstanding which patients may be at risk of cardiac events or sudden cardiac death is crucial to implement appropriate preventive measures. This study leverages patient-specific in vitro models and machine learning to improve the risk stratification of pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants associated with LQTS, better supporting clinical decisions related to risk assessment and management of LQTS patients. This scalable approach can be implemented across multiple centres, enhancing the risk stratification of LQTS variants beyond what is currently possible when clinical data are limited. Translational OutlookMachine learning-based variant risk stratification is a novel approach for integrating hiPSC-CM-derived electrophysiological data into clinical workflows. While this study demonstrates the feasibility of our approach, further research is required to validate these findings across larger and more diverse patient cohorts. Additionally, efforts to standardize the pipeline and adapt it for multicentric implementation are necessary. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=99 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/25324187v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (34K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@cb686org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a35603org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1640c6borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@16b6b78_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG Graphical Abstract C_FIG HighlightsO_LIDiscriminating LQTS patients at high or low risk for sudden death is a clinical challenge. C_LIO_LIImproved stratification of pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants is achievable through machine learning classification on in vitro electrophysiological data. C_LIO_LIIntegration of the clinical workflow with data from patient-specific in vitro models will enhance risk stratification. C_LI

Published in Cardiovascular Research (predicted rank #23) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.