Back

Evolutionary responses and genomic consequences of polyploidization in natural populations of Orychophragmus

Lai, Q.; Wang, Z.; Jia, C.; Qumu, X.; Wang, R.; Zhao, Z.; Liu, Y.; Hou, Y.; Liu, J.; Ingvarsson, P. K.; Wang, J.

2025-03-26 molecular biology
10.1101/2025.03.24.644964 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Polyploidization has occurred throughout the tree of life and is particularly common in plants. Despite its ubiquity, our understanding of the short- and long-term effects and consequences of genome doubling in natural populations remains incomplete. In this study, we identified a novel ploidy-variable species system within the ornamental and industrial oilseed genus Orychophragmus (Brassicaceae), which comprises six species, including diploid and tetraploid cytotypes of O. taibaiensis. By integrating population-scale genomic and transcriptomic datasets across the species in this genus, we constructed a robust phylogenetic framework and investigated the divergence and demographic history of O. taibaiensis in comparison to its relatives. Specifically, we characterized the geographical distribution patterns of diploids and tetraploids in natural populations of O. taibaiensis, confirmed the autopolyploid origin of tetraploids, and inferred their origin time relative to diploid counterparts. Our findings further revealed that, following genome doubling, tetraploids accumulated a higher genetic load of deleterious mutations, likely due to relaxed purifying selection facilitated by allelic redundancy. Additionally, genome doubling was associated with pronounced changes in gene expression patterns, with differentially expressed genes evolving under relaxed selective constraints. These results highlight that the initial masking of deleterious mutations, changes in expression regulation, and divergent efficacy of selection likely all contribute to shaping the establishment and evolutionary potential of polyploids.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.