Back

Strain Matters: The 129S1/SvlmJ Mouse Model Reveals the Genetic and Inflammatory Susceptibility to Hypertensive Complications

Orieux, A.; Boulestreau, R.; Bats, M.-L.; Michot, M.; Boyer, A.; Dinet, V.; Vaurs, J.; Dufourcq, P.; Peghaire, C.; DUPLAA, c.; Couffinhal, T.; Rubin, S.

2025-03-26 pathology
10.1101/2025.03.24.641145 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundHypertension is a leading cause of microvascular injury, yet the genetic determinants of organ-specific vulnerability remain poorly understood. Yest, we need good mouse models to investigate the complication of hypertension. This study investigates the role of genetic background in shaping hypertensive complications by comparing two mouse strains with divergent inflammatory responses. MethodsThree-month-old 129S1/SvlmJ and C57BL/6J mice received 600 ng/kg/min of angiotensin II (AngII) or saline. We compared the consequences of ANG2-induced blood pressure elevation on kidney function, BBB intergrity and cardiac hypertropy. Blood pressure (BP) was assessed by telemetry. Vascular injury markers in the brain, heart, kidneys, and retinas were systematically evaluated. ResultsBoth strains developed similar moderate hypertension with AngII. Only 129S1/SvlmJ mice exhibited spatial learning and memory deficits, blood-brain barrier hyperpermeability, astrocyte activation, retinal artery damage, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and renal podocyte lesions with urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR) after AngII treatment. Transcriptomic analysis of brain microvessels highlighted strain-specific differences in gene regulation, particularly in inflammatory pathways, which may explain the higher vulnerability of 129S1/SvlmJ mice to hypertensive organ damage. These findings were supported in vivo by increased resident and perivascular macrophage recruitment in the brain of C57BL6/J mice under AngII compared to the 129S1/SvlmJ strain. ConclusionOur findings highlight the critical role of genetic background in shaping hypertensive complications. The 129S1/SvlmJ strain serves as a valuable model for dissecting the molecular mechanisms of hypertensive organ damage, emphasizing neurovascular inflammation as a potential therapeutic target. Translational PerspectiveThis study highlights the 129/Sv mouse strain as a superior translational model compared to the widely used C57BL/6J strain, which, despite being a standard in cardiovascular research, fails to reliably reproduce severe hypertensive organ complications. The 129/Sv strain closely mimics human hypertensive damage, including cerebral small vessel disease, nephropathy, cardiomyopathy, and retinopathy. Transcriptomic analysis of cerebral microvessels identifies maladaptive inflammation as a critical mechanistic driver of susceptibility. These findings underline the clinical relevance of genetic predisposition, improving risk stratification and providing a robust preclinical platform to develop targeted anti-inflammatory therapies aimed at preventing hypertension-induced end-organ damage in patients.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cardiovascular Research
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
2
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
13.2%
3
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
71 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.2%
4
Circulation Research
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.2%
6
Hypertension
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
7
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
8
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.8%
9
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
10
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
11
Pharmacological Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.5%
14
Stroke
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
15
The FASEB Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
16
Life Sciences
27 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
17
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.2%
18
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
36 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
19
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
20
The American Journal of Pathology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
21
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.9%
22
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.6%
23
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
24
British Journal of Pharmacology
40 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
25
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
26
Physiological Reports
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%