Transformer-based artificial intelligence on single-cell clinical data for homeostatic mechanism inference and rational biomarker discovery
Tozzo, V.; Zhang, L. H.; Ranganath, R.; Higgins, J. M.
Show abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) applied to single-cell data has the potential to transform our understanding of biological systems by revealing patterns and mechanisms that simpler traditional methods miss. Here, we develop a general-purpose, interpretable AI pipeline consisting of two deep learning models: the Multi- Input Set Transformer++ (MIST) model for prediction and the single-cell FastShap model for interpretability. We apply this pipeline to a large set of routine clinical data containing single-cell measurements of circulating red blood cells (RBC), white blood cells (WBC), and platelets (PLT) to study population fluxes and homeostatic hematological mechanisms. We find that MIST can use these single-cell measurements to explain 70-82% of the variation in blood cell population sizes among patients (RBC count, PLT count, WBC count), compared to 5-20% explained with current approaches. MISTs accuracy implies that substantial information on cellular production and clearance is present in the single-cell measurements. MIST identified substantial crosstalk among RBC, WBC, and PLT populations, suggesting co-regulatory relationships that we validated and investigated using interpretability maps generated by single-cell FastShap. The maps identify granular single-cell subgroups most important for each populations size, enabling generation of evidence-based hypotheses for co-regulatory mechanisms. The interpretability maps also enable rational discovery of a single-WBC biomarker, "Down Shift", that complements an existing marker of inflammation and strengthens diagnostic associations with diseases including sepsis, heart disease, and diabetes. This study illustrates how single-cell data can be leveraged for mechanistic inference with potential clinical relevance and how this AI pipeline can be applied to power scientific discovery.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- DAISM-DNNXMBD: Highly accurate cell type proportion estimation with in silico data augmentation and deep neural networks 95%
- Essential Regression - a generalizable framework for inferring causal latent factors from multi-omic human datasets 94%
- Generative Modeling of Single Cell Gene Expression for Dose-Dependent Chemical Perturbations 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome-wide association study on 13,167 individuals identifies regulators of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell levels in human blood 94%
- Disruption of a GATA2, TAL1, ERG regulatory circuit promotes erythroid transition in healthy and leukemic stem cells 94%
- RBM15-MKL1 fusion protein promotes leukemia via m6A methylation and WNT pathway activation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Cell cycle dysregulation of globally important SAR11 bacteria resulting from environmental perturbation 93%
- Mycobacterium tuberculosis grows linearly at the single-cell level with larger variability than model organisms 93%
- Tracking bacterial lineages in complex and dynamic environments with applications to growth control and persistence 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.