Back

Acute Blood Pressure Responses To Different Resistance Exercises Using High- And Low-Intensity Velocity-Based Training Protocols In Individuals With Hypertension

Benavides, L.; Parra, G.; Zamuner, A. R.

2025-03-25 sports medicine
10.1101/2025.03.24.25324531 medRxiv
Show abstract

Hypertension is a chronic condition that requires proper management to prevent cardiovascular complications, and resistance exercise is a recommended strategy for its control. This study aimed to determine the acute effects of specific exercises, commonly used in resistance training programs, performed at two intensities (low and high) with equal volume, on blood pressure in individuals with pharmacologically controlled hypertension. A crossover clinical trial was conducted with 26 participants diagnosed with hypertension, each completing two resistance training sessions one low-intensity and one high-intensity including squats, rows, deadlifts, and bench presses. The order of exercise intensity for the first session was randomly assigned, and blood pressure was measured using an automated device before and immediately after each exercise. Comparisons between baseline and post-exercise values were analyzed, with a significance level set at 5%. The results showed that systolic blood pressure (SBP) increased during the squat, rows, and deadlift compared to baseline, with the deadlift producing the highest values. For diastolic blood pressure (DBP), no significant differences were observed from baseline, but the squat and deadlift elicited higher values than the rows and bench press. Additionally, high-intensity training resulted in lower DBP values compared to the low-intensity protocol. In conclusion, resistance exercise increases SBP regardless of intensity, with the squat and deadlift producing the most significant changes, while high-intensity training leads to lower DBP values than low-intensity protocols.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.